Hij had een relatie met P. Marks.
Kind(eren):
{geni:about_me} This census record could be Vincent or Vincent next generation (although there does not seem to be a Vincent next generation) https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XRH9-HP5
The problem with it being Vincent is that the wife is "P" and if Elizabeth was really born in 1764 or thereabouts, she would have been 65 in 1831.
* Vincent could have remarried, but it isn't clear that he did.
* Elizabeth could have been born a decade or more later as she married in 1797, which suggests a birth closer to 1775 or even later.
* The letter "P" is not reliable, other records from this era provide a wide variety of misnaming.
However,
* There is a tradition of naming children after their parents and other ancestors in this family.
* Based on the census records, it appears that Vincent had children who are not accounted for with the identified descendants.
* The date of Edward's birth is roughly right to be Vincent's grandson.
----
I am more and more inclined to think that V. Marks is Vincent and P is a second wife. Nelson county did not appear to keep good records.
De getoonde gegevens hebben geen bronnen.