Zij is getrouwd met Robert Seigneur d' Ivry.
Zij zijn getrouwd te 1st husband.Bron 3
Kind(eren):
Aubree de Bayeux | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert Seigneur d' Ivry |
He [Robert d'Ivry] married Aubrée, probably daughter of Hugh, BISHOP OF BAYEUX, son of Ralf of Ivry, COUNT OF BAYEUX (d). The date of his death is unknown. [Complete Peerage VIII:208, (transcribed by Dave Utzinger)](d) In which case she m., 2ndly, Albert de Cravent. Orderic relates that in 1080 a youth, Ralf, son of Albert de Cravent and Aubree, daughter of Hugh, Bishop of Bayeux, having robbed a monk on the highway, took refuge at Breval. At that time this place undoubtedly belonged to the family of Ivry and the name of Aubree suggests that the daughter of the Bishop had previously been married to Robert, a fact which would explain the origin of the signorial rights of the family in Ivry. On the other hand, the charter quoted in note "c" above suggests that her son by her presumed first husband, Robert, married in his father's lifetime, which is against the probability of a son being born of a second marriage. This however, is not impossible, and, moreover, the subscription of Hildeburge may have been added later.
He [Robert d'Ivry] married Aubrée, probably daughter of Hugh, BISHOP OF BAYEUX, son of Ralf of Ivry, COUNT OF BAYEUX (d). The date of his death is unknown. [Complete Peerage VIII:208, (transcribed by Dave Utzinger)](d) In which case she m., 2ndly, Albert de Cravent. Orderic relates that in 1080 a youth, Ralf, son of Albert de Cravent and Aubree, daughter of Hugh, Bishop of Bayeux, having robbed a monk on the highway, took refuge at Breval. At that time this place undoubtedly belonged to the family of Ivry and the name of Aubree suggests that the daughter of the Bishop had previously been married to Robert, a fact which would explain the origin of the signorial rights of the family in Ivry. On the other hand, the charter quoted in note "c" above suggests that her son by her presumed first husband, Robert, married in his father's lifetime, which is against the probability of a son being born of a second marriage. This however, is not impossible, and, moreover, the subscription of Hildeburge may have been added later.