Zij had een relatie met John de Hotham.
Kind(eren):
Matilda, daughter and coheir of 4th Lord (Baron) Hilton. [Burke'sPeerage]
----------------------------------
NOTE: BP, above seems to be following Dugdale in an error, as pointed outbelow by CP. Matilda (or Maud) was not the daughter of Robert 4th BaronHilton of Hilton, but of Robert Hilton of Swine (a junior branch of thefamily). The following text is from CP's account of Matilda/Maud's uncleThomas, who her son inherited from when he died. The text clearlydefines the relationships involved:
On the death of Thomas de Thweng [Marmaduke's 4th son] the Baronysupposed to have been created by the writ of 1307 fell into abeyance,according to modern doctrine, among his coheirs. These were: . . . (3)John de Hotham, of Scorborough, Yorks, son of Maud, sister of Isabel, byJohn de Hotham. Isabel and Maud were daughters of Margaret, sister ofThomas de Thweng by Robert de Hylton of Swine, Yorks (i). [CompletePeerage XII/1:743-4, XIV:612, (transcribed by Dave Utzinger)]
(i) The family of Hylton of Swine was a younger branch of Hylton or Hilton, of Hilton. Coll. Top. et Gen. (vol vii, p. 67), following Dugdale, is wrong in stating that Margaret m. Robert de Hilton of Hilton,co. Durham.
Maud (Matilda) de Hilton | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John de Hotham |