Genealogy Thrutchley/Anderson/Fitzgerel/Cox/Staley » Lady Mary Catherine Boleyn, Lady in Waiting, Royal Mistress of Henry 8th Tudor, Sister to Queen Anne, Countess of Wiltshire (1499-1543)

Personal data Lady Mary Catherine Boleyn, Lady in Waiting, Royal Mistress of Henry 8th Tudor, Sister to Queen Anne, Countess of Wiltshire 

• Alternative names: Mary Boleyn, Mary Boleyn, Lady Mary Catherine Countess of Wiltshire Boleyn Royal Mistress to King Henry VIII Stafford, Lady Mary Boleyn, Mary Catherine Countess of Wiltshire Boleyn Royal Mistress to King Henry VIII, Mary Boleyne, Mary Stafford, Lady Mary Catherine Boleyn ( Direct ), Mary (Mary ) Boleyn Mistress of King Henry, Mrs William (Mrs William ) Carye Boleyn
• She was born in the year 1499 in Hever Castle, Norfolk, England.

  Attention: Married (??-??-25) before birth (??-??-1499).

  Attention: Age at marriage (??-??-25) below 16 years (0).

  Attention: Age at marriage (November 28, 1512) below 16 years (13).

• Alternative: She was born in the year 1499 in Chilton, Wiltshire, England.
• Alternative: She was born April 1504 in Chilton, Wiltshire, ENGLAND.
• Alternative: She was born on 1504 or 1506 in Chilton Foliat, Wiltshire.
• Alternative: She was born in the year 1504 in Chilton, Wiltshire, England.Source 7
• Alternative: She was born in the year 1500 in Blickling Hall, Hever Castle, Norfolk, England.Source 5
• Alternative: She was born on December 16, 1485 in Archbishop's Palace, Alcalá De Henares, Madrid.
• Alternative: She was born in the year 1507 in Chilton, Berkshire, England.
• Alternative: She was born in the year 1506.
• Alternative: She was born in the year 1499 in Norfolk, England.
• Alternative: She was born May 1501 in Hever Castle, Kent, England.
• Alternative: She was born in the year 1499 in Newry, Down, Ireland.
• Alternative: She was born on 1504 or 1506 in Wolf Hall, Wiltshire, England.
• She died on June 19, 1543 in Hever, Sevenoaks District, Kent, England, she was 44 years old.

  Attention: Deceased (June 19, 1543) prior to birth (??-??-1550) of child (Elisabeth Stafford).

• Alternative: She died on July 19, 1543 in 1679544, Wiltshire, England, she was 44 years old.
• Alternative: She died on July 19, 1543 in Hampton Court, East Molesey, Surrey, England, she was 44 years old.
• Alternative: She died on July 19, 1543 in Hungerford, Wiltshire, ENGLAND, she was 44 years old.
• Alternative: She died on 19 Jul 1543 or 1534 in England, she was 35 years old.
• Alternative: She died in the year 07 in Hungerford, Wiltshire, England.Source 7
• Alternative: She died on May 19, 1536 in Chilton Foliat,Hungerford,Wiltshire,England, she was 37 years old.Source 5
• Alternative: She died on January 7, 1536 in Kimbolton, Huntingdonshire District, Cambridgeshire, England, she was 37 years old.
• Alternative: She died on July 30, 1543 in Bristol, Somerset, England, she was 44 years old.
• Alternative: She died on July 19, 1543 in Hungerford, Wiltshire, England, she was 44 years old.
• Alternative: She died on June 19, 1543 in England, she was 44 years old.
• Alternative: She died on January 15, 1569 in England, she was 70 years old.
• Alternative: She died on July 19, 1543, she was 44 years old.
• Alternative: She died on May 19, 1536 in Hampton Court, London Borough of Richmond upon Thames, Greater London, England, she was 37 years old.
• She is buried in Blickling, Broadland District, Norfolk, England.Source 5
• A child of Sir Thomas Boylen High Sherriff of Kent Baron & Knight of the Garter Lord Privacy Seal Ambassador of France Viscount of Rochford, 1st Earl of Wiltshire & Ormonde, Member of Parliament and Lady Elizabeth Howard of Stoke Neyland Baroness of Fitzwalter of Viscountess of Rochford & Fitzwalter 1st Countess of Wilt Ormonde, 2nd Countess of Sussux

Household of Lady Mary Catherine Boleyn, Lady in Waiting, Royal Mistress of Henry 8th Tudor, Sister to Queen Anne, Countess of Wiltshire

(1) She is married to Henry VIII Tudor Plantagenet, King of England, of the House of Plantagenet, Lord of Ireland; Prince of Wales.

They got married in the year 25 at Westminster Abbey, London, England.

Child(ren):

1. John Parry  1523-1590
2. Lady Mary Catherine "Kate" ("The Illegitimate Tudor") Carey (Cary), Lady of The Queen's Privy Chamber,  1524-1568 
3. William Edwards  1527-1563

(2) She is married to Sir William Cary, Esq.,.

They got married estimated around Between:1502/00, she was 3 years old.

Child(ren):

1. Sir Robert "Richard" Carey,  1515-1570 

(3) She is married to William Carey of Aldenham.

They got married on November 28, 1512 at Bristol, Gloucestershire, England, she was 13 years old.

Child(ren):

1. Lord Henry Carey 1st Baron Carey, 1st Baron Hunsdon  1526-1596 

(4) She is married to Robert Carey.

They got married on November 28, 1515 at Bristol, England, she was 16 years old.

Child(ren):

1. Robert Cary  1515-1570
2. John Cary  1515-1570
3. Richard Carye  1515-1586
4. Susannah Cary  1517-1580
5. Agnes Cary  ± 1517-1580
6. William Cary  1518-< 1572
7. Susan Cary  1519-1580
8. Agnes Cary  1521-1580
9. Catherine Cary  1524-1568
10. Lady Mary Catherine Knollys Carey  1524-1568
11. Christine Cary  1525-1560

(5) She is married to WILLIAM Sir Stafford IV of Grafton; Essex landowner & soldier; 2nd husband of Mary Boleyn the lover of King Henry VIII; 1532: 1 of 200 who accompanied Henry VIII to France to show King Francis I of France his new fiancee Anne Boleyn;.

They got married on February 4, 1520 at Flempton, Suffolk, England, she was 21 years old.

Child(ren):

1. Lady Mary Catherine Kate CAREY, Lady of The Queen's Privy Chamber  1524-1568
2. Elisabeth Stafford  1550-± 1601
3. Thomas Stafford  ????-1584

Child(ren):

1. Thomas Carey  ± 1518-1578
2. Bridget Carre  1520-1551
3. Katherine Carey  1520-1524
4. Agnes Cary  1521-1580
5. Jane Dalyson  1523-1551
6. William Joseph George Carey  1524-1572
7. Joan Carre  ± 1524-????
8. Christian Anne Carye  1525-1560
9. John Carey  1526-1617
10. George Cary  1527-1617
11. Margaret Alberye  1529-1558 
12. Anne ("The Real One") de Stafford  1535-1568
13. Ursula Carey  ????-1603
14. Valentine Cary  ????-1626

Notes about Lady Mary Catherine Boleyn, Lady in Waiting, Royal Mistress of Henry 8th Tudor, Sister to Queen Anne, Countess of Wiltshire

~ Mary Boleyn Marries William Carey, A Guest Post by Lissa Bryan ~
On February 4, 1520, Mary Boleyn, sister of Anne Boleyn, married William Carey. Historians have debated for centuries whether this marriage ended her affair with Henry VIII.
Mary Boleyn has suffered almost as much from myth and slander in history as her sister, Anne. She's been called the "English Mare" of the king of France. She's said to have been the mother of Henry's children. As it turns out, neither is likely true.
The birth dates of the three famous Boleyn siblings are in question, as is the order of their birth. Mary is thought by many scholars to be the eldest surviving daughter because if Anne had been the oldest daughter, it should have been mentioned in the patents creating her Marquess of Pembroke. Mary was also married first, as was traditional for the elder sister.
Mary was likely born around 1499 or 1500 at Blickling Hall to Thomas Boleyn and his wife Elizabeth Howard. Thomas later complained that right after they were married, Elizabeth had a child every year and they had only a small pension to live on. We know of five Boleyn children for certain, but only three of those survived to adulthood. (Two graves of infant boys are still extant; there may have been more children who never had memorials or their graves are lost.)
The family moved to Hever Castle shortly after the death of Thomas's father in 1505.
Thomas seems to have been a very erudite and well-educated man who ensured that his children also received a fine education. We don't know the specifics, but all three Boleyn children turned out to be eloquent writers, and they each spoke more than one language.
Besides the academic topics covered in their education, the girls would have been taught courtly manners and how to dance gracefully. Thomas had grand plans for his children, and they all had to be prepared to be glittering jewels of the court.
Mary was sent to the French court in 1514 when Princess Mary Tudor, the sister of King Henry, married the king of France. But that union was short-lived. The king died only months after the marriage. Mary remained in France after the princess returned home and became a maid of honor for the new queen Claude.
Mary may have been a short-term mistress of the newly-crowned King Francis at some point during her five years in the French court, or it's possible that something caused a rumor to spring up to that effect. Some historians question it, speculating that Mary's reputation may have been slandered in order to cast shame on her sister, Anne. A letter from the Bishop of Faenza in 1536 is the only contemporary record of it.
"[T]hat woman [Anne Boleyn] pretended to have miscarried of a son, not being really with child, and, to keep up the deceit, would allow no one to attend on her but her sister, whom the French king knew here in France per una grandissima ribalda et infame sopre tutte." [A great whore, infamous above all.]
However, there are some obvious problems with this letter. Mary had been banished from court in 1534 and was not with Anne during her final miscarriage. Chapuys claims to have spoken with people who examined the fetus and said it was a normal male of about four months gestation, so Anne's pregnancy was not feigned. The Bishop's veracity in repeating Francis's supposed remark must thus be viewed with a healthy amount of skepticism.
Beyond that, all we have are later historians, starting with Nicholas Sander in Elizabeth's reign, whose Rise and Growth of the Anglican Schism gave us the claim that Francis called Anne (not Mary, though his words were soon assigned to describe her) his "English Mare" or "royal mule."
Herbert repeats the claim as well, quoting William Rastal's version for good measure.
"This author, though learned, yet more credulous than becomes a man of exact judgment, reports out of one William Rastal, a judge, (in his life of Sir Thomas More) that Mistress Anne Bolen was the king’s daughter, by the wife of Sir Thomas Bolen, while, sub specie minoris, he was employ’d by the king, ambassador in France; and that this gentlewoman coming to the age of fifteen, was deflour’d by some domesticks of her father’s, and then sent to France; where also she behav’d herself so licentiously, that she was vulgarly call’d the hackney of England, till being adopted to that king’s familiarity, she was termed his mule."
Later authors repeated the slander, applying it to Mary, not Anne, and it appeared so many times in biographies and books about the period that it became accepted as fact.
Upon her return to the English court in early 1519, Mary Boleyn became the mistress of Henry VIII. We don't know when the affair began, but it appears to have started quickly after her arrival at the English court. Henry's affair with Bessie Blount had ended with the birth of his son and it appears he was looking for a replacement.
English kings didn't have "official mistresses" who had political power, and so chroniclers of the day tended to ignore the women who came and went in monarchs' lives. This is why the beginning of Henry's relationships were shrouded in secrecy until he began marrying the women who caught his interest.
Mary was married to William Carey in February, 1520. She had two children during her marriage with Carey, Catherine and Henry. Some have claimed that one, if not both, of those children were fathered by king Henry, but it seems likely if they had been his issue, he would have seized upon this evidence of his virility, as he had done with his son by Bessie Blount.
Henry VIII was sensitive about the perception of his fertility. As soon as Bessie Blount gave him a son, Henry publicly claimed the boy and ennobled him — something no king had done for hundreds of years. Even after his other children were bastardized, Henry kept them in the public eye.
Why would he not have claimed Mary Boleyn's children, as well, even if he didn't go to the extra step of ennobling Henry Carey? It seems odd that he would not even have mentioned fathering a son with Mary Boleyn when he was busy pointing out his marriage with his queen was "cursed" by God with infertility but he could easily father male children with other women.
Some have posited that he feared public or papal disapproval would mean not being able to marry Anne if it was known he'd had children with her sister, but he was not interested in Anne until 1526 and didn't start the process of trying to make her his wife until a year after that. This theory grants Henry supernatural foresight to keep the parentage of Mary's children secret in case he ever fell for her sister in the future.
The alternative theory has Mary and Carey in a long-term, sexless marriage of convenience to cover Henry's illicit relationship with her. She doesn't conceive until five years into her relationship with the king, and then gives him a son two years later. In this scenario, the end of Henry's relationship with Mary coincides with the first recorded declaration of the king's interest her sister, Anne Boleyn.
Is there any evidence Henry's involvement with Mary continued after 1520 and her marriage to William Carey?
The chief evidence seems to rest on a series of grants that Henry made to William Carey between 1522 and 1526, which some argue were akin to payments for the "use" of Carey's wife.
Genealogy Magazine notes: "Mary Boleyn’s affair with the King probably commenced at about the same time: 1522. The spate of royal grants to her [Mary Boleyn’s] husband [William Carey] in 1522, 1523, 1524 and 1525 is also suggestive. [T]he first manors and estates, as opposed to minor keeperships and stewardships, that Mary’s husband possessed were granted to him by the crown in June 1524 and February 1526. It should be especially noted that the February 1526 grant occurred on the 20th, just twelve days before the recorded birth of Henry Carey on 4 March 1525/6. Significantly, this royal grant included the borough of Buckingham which was granted to William Carey 'in tail male.' It is impossible not to be struck by the coincidence of this entailment to a male 'heir,' just twelve days before the date of record on which William Carey’s wife gave birth to a male child said to be the king’s son."
I find no significance in the grant being "in tail male." That was a normal part of the wording of grants of the era. Secondly, there's no way Henry could have known the upcoming baby was a boy, so there's no "coincidence." Why wouldn't the king have waited for the birth itself if it was a celebration of his child, or waited to see if the baby turned out to be a boy if the intent was to give a grant to his son? Considering the high infant mortality of the day, and the equally high possibility the child could have been a girl or a stillbirth, it's likely the grant had nothing to do with Mary's current pregnancy.
If Henry wanted to hide his relationship with Mary, why "pay" her husband openly in the form of grants, which were recorded for posterity? Why wouldn't Henry just secretly slide some cash across the table to Carey?
There is no reason to assume that the grants were on Mary Boleyn's behalf. William Carey was Henry's second cousin, and a favored member of his court. He received grants in roughly the same pattern and amount as others of Henry's favorites — there was nothing unusual about this stream of gifts from the king's hands, so it did not have to be in "payment" of anything.
Another point I've seen mentioned is the dispensation Henry requested to marry Anne Boleyn. He asked in it to be freed of any impediments arising from both illicit intercourse and consanguinity, which people say wouldn't have been necessary without children from the relationship. This is incorrect. Anne and Henry were related, and so the dispensation was needed to absolve them of the blood relation of their common descent.
If there had been children from his union with Mary, that would also need to be addressed in the dispensation. In other words, he would have had to be dispensed to marry the aunt of his children, because there would otherwise be an incestuous relationship. Henry also needed a dispensation to clear himself of the illicit intercourse with her sister, whether or not there had been any children from the union, and Anne had to be cleared of any impediments remaining from her relationship with Henry Percy.
The other "evidence" for the Carey children being Henry's comes from snippets of recorded gossip. An ambassador mentioned a promising "natural son" of Henry's in 1531, who was the son of a widow of one of his peers. But this could easily refer to Henry FitzRoy, since Bessie Blount had been widowed the previous year.
A court case in 1535 contained the following statement:
"Moreover, Mr. Skydmore dyd show to me yongge Master Care, saying that he was our suffren Lord the Kynge's son by our suffren Lady the Qwyen's syster, whom the Qwyen's grace myght not suffer to be yn the Cowrte."
However, Mary had been welcome at Anne's court and given positions of honor until she secretly re-married in 1534. So Anne's supposed banishment of Mary out of jealousy does not seem to ring true.
These stories show only that there was contemporary gossip, nothing more.
The last bit of evidence centers on a supposed resemblance Henry Carey had to the king. But this, too, is easily explicable. Henry and William Carey were both descendants of the Beauforts. (William Carey's grandmother was the niece of Margaret Beaufort's father.)
The Carey children had red hair, but red hair ran in the Howard family (Elizabeth Howard was Mary and Anne Boleyn's mother.) Katheryn Howard had red hair, Anne Boleyn herself may have been a red head, and we don't know what color Mary Boleyn's hair was.
In my opinion, there isn't any conclusive evidence that Mary Boleyn's children were Henry's, and the evidence they weren't is actually stronger.
Finding Mary a husband seems to have marked the end of Henry's involvement with her, as it did with Bessie Blount, a final parting gift or consolation prize. There's no evidence his involvement with either woman extended after her marriage.
The king was the one who decided when these women would marry — their families would not risk angering him by arranging a marriage to another man while the king was still interested in their daughter.
There was no reason for the king to marry off either woman before he was "done" with her, either. He had no embarrassment in claiming Bessie Blount's bastard as his own, or he would have hurriedly tried to marry her to someone else as soon as he found out she was pregnant. Instead, he waited until after the child had been born and their affair was over.
Another bit of evidence lies in Reginald Pole's chiding letter to Henry about the hypocrisy of annulling his marriage to Katharine of Aragon in order to marry Anne when his relationship with Mary created the exact same kind of incestual relationship.
"[Anne] had learned, I think, if from nothing else, at least from the example of her own sister, how soon you got tired of your mistresses; and she resolved to surpass her sister in retaining you as her lover..."
Pole's letter says nothing about Henry having children with Mary, and he mentions Henry growing quickly tired of his mistress. A relationship of six years (giving him time to father both children) doesn't really fit with Pole's description of Henry quickly tiring of a lover.
Pole, too, would have had a problem with Henry keeping a married woman as his mistress, violating the sanctity of another man's marriage bed.
When Mary Boleyn was widowed in 1528, the king showed little or no interest in the fate of her children until Anne Boleyn interceded and urged the king to get her father to support Mary.
Henry wrote to Anne, who was still recovering from the same epidemic of the Sweat that had killed her brother-in-law, and assured her that he had contacted Thomas Boleyn. One of his statements in the letter is especially poignant, given the situation:
"... for surely, whatsoever is said, it cannot so stand with his honour but that he must needs take her, his natural daughter, now in her extreme necessity."
His own "natural daughter" and "natural son" would have been in poverty if they were Henry's children. Henry was later guilty of gross, extreme hypocrisies, but it's hard to imagine that Anne wouldn't have pointed out his own honor compelled him to support the children if they were his, just as Thomas's honor compelled him to support Mary.
One wonders what Mary Boleyn would have thought if the king wouldn't even publicly acknowledge her children, while giving his son with Bessie Blount two dukedoms in 1525, but leaving Mary's children in poverty. This disparity in the treatment of his supposed children is problematic when there's no real reason for it.
The Boleyn family eventually settled a pension on Mary of £100 per year, and Mary's son, Henry Carey, became Anne's ward. She would see to his education and upkeep as a man of gentle blood, reducing Mary's financial burdens.
The records are silent about Mary's life for the next few years after she was widowed. We don't know where she lived, but some believe she returned to stay at Hever Castle. Her family would have been at court with Anne, her mother as chaperone and her father trying to champion the king's annulment from Katharine of Aragon.
The only mention of her is in 1530, when Anne was given £20 from the king's purse to buy a jewel from Mary. Had it been a gift to Mary from Henry at some point — or as one scholar theorized, had Anne pawned it to her? The latter seems odd, since Anne had greater access to funds than Mary did.
In 1532, Mary traveled with Anne on her trip to France with the king to be presented as his consort, so she may have been back at court already as one of Anne's attendants. At the masquerade where Anne not-so-subtly met with Francis, Mary was given the position of honor, walking directly behind the new queen-to-be. If Mary really was Francis's mistress at one point, it's tempting to speculate about what their reunion meeting must have been like.
Does Mary's position of honor indicate the sisters were also emotionally close? Many have portrayed Mary and Anne as being jealous of one another, but we have no evidence one way or the other. Mary had another position of honor when her sister was crowned the following year, and she remained at court as a lady in waiting to the new queen.
In 1534, Mary secretly wed William Stafford. Stafford wasn't a suitable match for her. Mary was in her mid-thirties at this time, and Stafford was about twelve years younger than she. He was a soldier, the second son of a Essex landowner, and a commoner to boot. Stafford was stationed at Calais in 1533, and perhaps that's where his romance with Mary Boleyn began.
Mary managed to keep the marriage a secret until she became pregnant. When the Boleyns found out, they were horrified and furious. Mary was sister of the queen; her marriage was a matter of state interest. For her to arrange her own match for personal preference instead of family benefit was both disobedient to the social order and disrespectful of her sister's position. It made the family look ill-behaved, and it brought an unknown person of uncertain alliances dangerously close to the throne.
Mary and Stafford were banished from court. We don't know where Mary lived during this time. What is known is that Mary's financial situation became so dire, she was reduced to begging the king and queen for help.
Unable to write directly to Anne, Mary wrote an eloquent letter to Cromwell about the situation. She asked him to speak to Henry or Anne on her behalf.
"... But one thing, good master secretary, consider that he was young, and love overcame reason; and for my part, I saw so much honesty in him that I loved him as well as he did me, and was in bondage, and glad I was to be at liberty: so that for my part, I saw that all the world did set so little by me, and he so much, that I thought I could take no better way but to take him and to forsake all other ways, and live a poor honest life with him;
[...]
"But if I were at my liberty and might choose, I assure you, master secretary, for my little time, I have tried so much honesty to be in him, that I would rather beg my bread with him than to be the greatest queen christened; and I believe verily he is in the same case with me, for I believe verily he would not forsake me to be a king [...]
"Also I pray you desire my lord of Norfolk, and my lord my brother [George Boleyn] to be good to us; I dare not write to them, they are so cruel against us; but if with any pain that I could take with my life I might win their good wills, I promise you there is no child living would venture more than I[.]"
If Cromwell replied to this letter, it is not recorded. The records are also silent as to whether Mary's uncle, the Duke of Norfolk, or her brother George relented in their anger toward her. Anne is said to have sent Mary funds, but there's no record of it in her expenses.
Ultimately, Anne couldn't allow Mary to return to court. Mary had defied the social order and endangered the throne itself by bringing an unknown man into the royal family and that was something Anne could not publicly forgive without causing severe damage to her own reputation.
Sadly, Mary seemed to have either lost the child she was carrying, or the baby died shortly after birth. Various sources record that she had a child named Anne or Edward, but there is no solid record of Mary having any issue with William Stafford. Her descendants today originate from her children with William Carey.
It’s thought Mary and Anne never saw one another again after Mary was sent from court. It wasn't long afterward that Anne and George went to the scaffold. There is no record of Mary attempting to contact them in prison. That's not proof she didn't, of course. Perhaps she knew there was nothing she could do.
Nor is there any record she ever made contact with Anne's daughter, Elizabeth, after her execution. One movie has Mary Boleyn striding away with baby Elizabeth under her arm to care for her after her mother's death, but that's entirely fictional. Elizabeth's accounts note no letters, gifts from Mary, or visits. Elizabeth's household was carefully monitored by the king and any contact with Mary would have been noted.
In March 1539, when her father died, Mary inherited the Boleyn estate, which allowed her to fund her children Henry and Catherine's careers at court.
Henry never attempted to arrange fine marriages for Mary Boleyn's children, which one would think would be the least he could do if they were his. It was, after all, his royal blood that would be diluted if they married a commoner. The two Carey children married well, but the king didn't provide Catherine with a dowry, or intercede to find Henry Carey a better bride than a simple country gentlewoman.
In short, Henry never behaved as an interested father toward these children, taking interest in their education or in seeing them set up with good marriages. They were on their own, as far as he was concerned.
In 1542, Mary inherited the property of her executed sister-in-law, Jane Parker. But legal wrangling over the property lasted until 1543, and Mary and Stafford only acquired Rochford Hall a few days before Mary died. She was about 42 years old.
The cause of her death isn't recorded, but there's no evidence she had suffered any sort of lingering illness. It may have been sudden, and to the Tudors, inexplicable.
The location of her grave is also unknown. She may have been buried at St. Andrews at Rochford, but the church records do not go back that far and no trace survives of her tomb. It's possible the tomb may have been destroyed in the Reformation.
Most of Mary's property was inherited by her son, Henry, but she did leave some of her estate to William Stafford. Stafford remarried about a decade after her death and had to flee to Geneva because of his Protestant beliefs. There he called himself "Lord Rochford" — a title to which he had no right.
There are many descendants of Mary Boleyn today. One of them — though their identity is kept secret — sends flowers to the grave of Mary's sister, Anne Boleyn, every year on the anniversary of her execution.

Do you have supplementary information, corrections or questions with regards to Lady Mary Catherine Boleyn, Lady in Waiting, Royal Mistress of Henry 8th Tudor, Sister to Queen Anne, Countess of Wiltshire?
The author of this publication would love to hear from you!

Timeline Lady Mary Catherine Boleyn, Lady in Waiting, Royal Mistress of Henry 8th Tudor, Sister to Queen Anne, Countess of Wiltshire

Click on the names for more info. Symbols used:  grandparents    parents    brothers/sisters    children