Zij is getrouwd met Dunlaing Ó Caellaide.
Zij zijn getrouwd rond 1023 te 2ND Husband.
Kind(eren):
Name Prefix:Princess Name Suffix: of Ossary
Name Prefix:Princess Name Suffix: of Ossary
Although I find lots of multiple marriages between various people (with no apparent death or divorces in between) in the Welsh, Irish, and Viking lines. So I think they "fooled around" a lot and took their wedding vows somewhat lightly. And so-called "bastards" didn't seem to be disadvantaged as much as in the French/Norman/English society.
I have put "bef 1059" as her preferred death date, leaving the 1098 as an alternative. I have also included your post-em as a reason for doing so. . . . Jim Weber
The following post-em from Mike Lysell, (XXXXX@XXXX.XXX), plus myreply explains my setting Derbforgaill's death date at "bef 1259".
Jim- based on their dates od death, it appears that Tairdelbach isDerbforgaill's 3rd husband. Since he married a second time before1059., shouldn't her DOD be "abt 1058" and not 1098? Any thoughts onthis?
Mike Lysell
- - - - and my reply - - - -
Mike,
I expect that you are probably right. Although I find lots ofmultiple marriages between various people (with no apparent death ordivorces in between) in the Welsh, Irish, and Viking lines. So Ithink they "fooled around" a lot and took their wedding vows somewhatlightly. And so-called "bastards" didn't seem to be disadvantaged asmuch as in the French/Norman/English society.
I have put "bef 1059" as her preferred death date, leaving the 1098 asan alternative. I have also included your post-em as a reason fordoing so. . . .
Jim Weber
Ban Senchus 190.[Custer February 1, 2002 Family Tree.FTW]
[merge G675.FTW]
Ban Senchus 190.
[large-G675.FTW]
Ban Senchus 190.
Dirborgaill ingen Taidg O'Caellaide | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
± 1023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dunlaing Ó Caellaide |
De getoonde gegevens hebben geen bronnen.