Zij had een relatie met Raleigh Croshaw.
Kind(eren):
Mrs. Raleigh Croshaw | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Croshaw | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mrs. Raleigh Croshaw<br>Married name: Mrs. Raleigh Crowshaw<br>Gender: Female<br>Birth: Circa 1570 - England<br>Husband: Captain Raleigh Croshaw<br>Children: Katherine Graves (born Croshaw), Major Joseph Croshaw, Noah Croshaw, Richard Croshaw<;/a>, William Croshaw<br> Additional information: LifeSketch:MRS RALEIGH CROSHAW, NAME UNKNOWNh information: UNKNOWNgh Croshaw!Richard Croshaw and Major Joseph Croshaw. tain Rawleigh Crashaw, of Kequotan, gent., and ancient planter," about 1623. fe, whoe came in the Bona Nova in 1620 and 25 Lbs. adventured &c." uestion that arrived in the Bona Nova was the wife of the servant. "his servant and his wife'she would be named and she would have been recorded before the servant. She is listed after the servant because they arrived together as a 'packaged deal' so to speak 'one servant and one servant's wife' neither the servant nor the servant's wife's name were provided because they were servants and the important thing to Raleigh anyway was that he paid for their transport and was therefore due to be reimbursed with land. Other patents of the same time, which record other colonists wives, actually name the wife. ld not possibly have arrived in 1620. It is known that Raleigh arrived in Virginia in 1608. It is widely accepted that 'Major Joseph Croshaw' was his son, and that Joseph was born in 1610. Therefore, for Joseph to be born in Virginia in 1610, obviously his mother had to be in Virginia in 1610 and could not therefore be the woman who arrived on the Bona Nova in 1620.ify Joseph and Richard Croshaw as brothers; nothing indicates they were 'natural' or illegitimate. So the woman who birthed them was Raleigh's legally accepted wife. d that Joseph and Richard were well educated, I have often read that Joseph was educated in England.ds may have been burned in the many fires known to have destroyed the churches and courthouse. However, there are surviving records regarding his death and administration of his estate, and no wife or children were name there either. int prior to this. Presumably because relations with the Indians were so unsettled and so that the boys could be educated. 9;s; apparently when they returned to Virginia as adults, after completing their education. 39;Ursula Unity Powhatan' or Rachel Powhatan /Patawomeck' There does not appear to be any real documentation that any of these women really existed. At least no documentation has been found to date to support their existence.get permission from the governor to marry her. Their son Thomas was recorded as the FIRST child of English/ American Indian parents. This plainly disqualified Raleigh's wife from being Native American, either Powhatan or Patawomeck. For Joseph was born in 1610 so Raleigh's marriage and the birth of Joseph clearly predate Pocahontas and Rolfe by 4 years. Virginia in 1610/1611. Most of the information we have about the Powhatan Indians and surrounding tribes comes from what he recorded. He spoke directly with the Indians. One of his primary sources was Paramount Chief Powhatan's brother in law Machumps. Strachey named 6 of Powhatan's children but never mentioned Unity, Ursula or Rachel or any daughter that married Croshaw. And the marriage of Croshaw and a daughter of Powhatan predating the marriage Pocahontas would have been a very big deal and certainly a recordable event. Such a marriage would have made the kidnapping of Pocahontas in 1613 unnecessary.riginally comes from but I could find no information to support it, just family trees with no sources given. Does not mean it is wrong but does not mean that it is correct either., this at least has an original source: a marriage record dated 25 February 1607. The marriage took place in Newchurch in Rossendale, Lancashire, England and it IS believed that Raleigh was from Lancashire BUT the groom in the record is only identified as 'Chrawshey'. I suppose that COULD be Raleigh Croshaw, but it could also be his brother, uncle, cousin, grandfather, 3rd cousin once removed or some other bloke that lived in the area. There is nothing to confirm that this was indeed Raleigh.NOTNATIVEAMERICAN:Oldest child was born in 1586, before colonists ever came to Virginia, before the English encountered the Powhatan Indians.
The FamilySearch Family Tree is published by MyHeritage under license from FamilySearch International, the largest genealogy organization in the world. FamilySearch is a nonprofit organization sponsored by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon Church).