Il est marié avec Jane McCaw.
Ils se sont mariés le 27 juillet 1817, il avait 19 ans.
Enfant(s):
http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=1220964&pid=494/ Ancestry.com
Name: Daniel Harcort Birth Date: abt 1797 Birth Place: Maryland Residence Date: 1850 Residence Place: District 16, Jasper, Iowa/ Ancestry.com
Name: Daniel Harcourt Birth Date: abt 1798 Birth Place: MD Residence Date: 1885 Residence Place: West Fork, Woodbury, IA/ Ancestry.com
Name: Daniel Harcourt Birth Date: abt 1798 Birth Place: Maryland Residence Date: 1880 Residence Place: Monroe, Jasper, Iowa, United States/ Ancestry.com
Residence date: 1820 Residence place: Springfield, Franklin, Indiana, United States/ Ancestry.com
Birth date: abt 1798 Birth place: Maryland Residence date: 1856 Residence place: Fairview/ Ancestry.com
Birth date: abt 1798 Birth place: Maryland Residence date: 1860 Residence place: Elk Creek, Jasper, Iowa, United States/ Ancestry.com
Residence date: 1836 Residence place: Iowa County, WI/ Ancestry.com
"The first person tried by a jury was Daniel Harcourt, who was charged 'with removing and destroying the boundaries of a lot of land." Road viewers had been appointed to lay out a road to which Dr. Harcourt was opposed. The projected road was described by its proximity to certain marks of the government surveys; namely, the stake on the corner of the section and the trees called witnes trees, upon the bark of which had been cut letters and figures showing the quarter section ad the number of the section. The road viewers met to perform their duty, but the found that Dr. Harcourt and his son-in-law had removed the stake, and that the marks of the witness trees had been so nicely filled with moss and lichens that no one unacquainted with their position could tell where they had been. The case turned on the reobal of the stake. Dr. Harcourt claimed that the original stake had been destroyed by a fire, that he and his son-in-law had put another in its place, and that, having put it there themselves, they had a right to take it away again. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty."/ Allen County Public Library