Family Tree Welborn » William I Bynum Baynham (± 1690-1746)

Persoonlijke gegevens William I Bynum Baynham 

• Hij is geboren rond 1690 in Isle of Wight County, Virginia Colony, Colonial America.
• Hij is overleden tussen March 12, 1746 en April 24, 1746 in Edgcombe County, or, Albemarle, Bertie County, Province of North Carolina, Colonial America.
• Hij is begraven in Edgecombe County, North Carolina.
• Een kind van John James Monroe Bynum Baynham en Elizabeth Bynum (Mizell Mizzel)
• Een kind van James Monroe Bynum (Byenum) en Elizabeth Bynum (Mizell)
• Deze gegevens zijn voor het laatst bijgewerkt op 27 juli 2023.

Gezin van William I Bynum Baynham

Hij is getrouwd met Mary Bynum (Fort).

Marriage
Date: 1730
Marriage
Date: 1724
Place: Isle, , Virginia, USA

Zij zijn getrouwd op 21 juli 1725 te Isle of Wight, Isle of Wight, Virginia, United States.

Kind(eren):

1. William II Bynum Baynham  1724-1781 
2. Drury Bynum  ± 1725-1761
3. Mary Bynum  1726-1793
4. Luke Bynum  1730-1810
5. Abagail Bynum  1730-1776
6. Ann Bynum  ± 1740-± 1771
7. Mary Fort Bynum  1749-1793
8. Celia Bynum  
9. Rebecca Bynum  

Notities over William I Bynum Baynham

William Bynum, I
Gender: Male
Birth: circa 1690 Isle of Wight County, Virginia Colony, Colonial America
Death: between March 12, 1746 and April 24, 1746 (51-60) Edgcombe County, or, Albemarle, Bertie County, Province of North Carolina, Colonial America
Place of Burial: Edgecombe County, North Carolina, United States

Immediate Family:
Son of James Monroe Bynum and Fnu (Mizell) Bynum

Husband of Elizabeth Fort (Sugars)

and Mary Bynum (Fort)

Father of Drury Bynum; Benjamin Bynum; Abigail Bynum; Michael Bynum; Celia Colia Bynum; Jesse Bynum; James Bynum; William Bynum, II; Mary Fort Bell (Bynum); Luke Bynum; Isaac Bynum; Ann Bynum and Rebecca Bynum

Brother of James Bynum

https://www.geni.com/people/William-Bynum-I/6000000001931930195

William Bynum, I is your 7th great grandfather.
You ¬â€  ·Üí Henry Marvin Welborn
your father ·Üí Emma Corine Welborn (Bombard)
his mother ·Üí Emma Elizabeth Free / Bombard (Davis)
her mother ·Üí Nancy Isabelle Davis (Bynum)
her mother ·Üí Robert Bynum
her father ·Üí Mark Bynum
his father ·Üí William Bynum, III
his father ·Üí William Bynum, II
his father ·Üí William Bynum, I
his father

https://www.geni.com/people/William-Bynum-I/6000000001931930195

The progenitors of the Bynum family came from Wales early in 1600. The name partook of the Welsh and was spelled Beinheim, and from that to Binham, and then to Bynum. William (circa 1690), the great grandfather od Asa and John, Isaac's father and his brother came from England in 1735 and settled in North Carolina.
SOURCE- Genealogy of the Murphrees-Bynum Created by an independent genealogy expert for one of Parker Dometis Bullard's granddaughters.

·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî
Bynums in America
Posted 31 Dec 2012 by waxpacks

John Bynum (c1616 ·Äì 1691): The First Two Generations

1.John Bynum (c1616 ·Äì 1691) John Bynum, the ancestor of the majority of American Bynums, makes his first appearance in Surry County, Virginia in 1663. Surry County had been formed in 1652 from the part of James City County which lay south of the James River. Records before 1652, which were kept in the James City courthouse, no longer exist and there is no mention of John Bynum in the first ten years of Surry records, nor in any Virginia patent records. With no record of John Bynum prior to 1663, the question of his origin may never be answered. However, it seems likely that he had been in Virginia prior to 1663, since a later record indicates he was in his late 40s at the time, a relatively old age for a recent immigrant.

On 28 February 1662/3, the widow of Henry Meadow sold 100 acres to ·ÄúJohn Bineham·Äù, apparently carrying out an agreement between her late husband and Bineham.[1] On 5 December 1663, George and Margaret Blow sold parts of a patent granted to Blow earlier that year, one of them to ·ÄúJohn Bynam·Äù.[2] Both of these parcels were within a mile of one another, in the eastern part of Surry County near the Isle of Wight county line. The parcel purchased from George Blow was located just west of Green Swamp, on the south side of a creek which is now called Mill Creek. John Bynum would live on this land for almost sixteen years.

The first surviving tithables list for Surry County is the 1668 tax list, on which John Bynum is listed as a single tithable. He was listed thereafter in the annual Surry tithables through 1690, for the first several years being adjacent to Richard Smith, who had married George Blow·Äôs widow and who was apparently living on Blow·Äôs land.[3] In each tithables list he was enumerated in Lawnes Creek parish, the parish covering the extreme eastern segment of Surry County.

He is mentioned relatively infrequently in other records, appearing in neither the court nor deed records for fifteen years after his land purchase. In late 1678 he was one of several persons indicted for not attending church, but successfully pleaded that ·Äúhe did frequently goe to church before his sickness and that at the last court he was desperately sick.·Äù[4] A few months later, on 4 March 1679, the inventory of John Twyford was presented to the Surry court by Richard Smith, who had married Twyford·Äôs widow Mary (his former wife Margery Blow Smith evidently having died). According to this record, a small piece of land belonging to Twyford had been leased to John Bynum.[5] Later the same year, on 29 September 1679, John Bynum sold to Richard Jordan Sr. the land he had purchased from George Blow back in 1663.[6] The deed was signed by the marks of John and Rosamond Bynum, thus giving us our first mention of his wife. When both appeared in court on 6 January 1680 to acknowledge the sale, the clerk recorded her as ·ÄúRose his wife·Äù.[7]

He apparently sold that land to move onto 215 acres for which a patent was issued eighteen months later on 23 April 1681.[8] This land was located on the Mill Branch (a different stream) about three miles further south but still near the Isle of Wight County line. Later that year, on 1 October 1681, John Bynum and his wife Rosamond sold 100 acres of this land ·Äúon the west side of the branch John now lives on·Äù to William Webb.[9] The remaining portion 100 or so acres of the patent would remain in the Bynum family for several decades.

In the 1681 tithables, ·ÄúJno. Byneham Senr. & Junr.·Äù are listed, the first appearance of his elder son. The following year, his son James Bynum first appears in the tithables. Through 1684, both sons are listed in the tithables with or near their father in Lawnes Creek parish. But by 1685, both sons were listed with Richard and George Blow, sons of George Blow Sr., in Southwarke parish. They were apparently living on Richard Blow·Äôs land on Pigeon Creek, several miles to the northwest and across the parish border, perhaps with their older sister.

John Bynumမs birth year is roughly established by a subsequent court record. In May 1687 he petitioned the Surry Court: လthat he is seaventy yrs of age and thereby soe disabled that he is hardly able to keepe himself from being a parish charge and therefore humbly prayed that he might be exempted from paying levies, beareing of armes, and cleareing of high waies, and it appearing that he is very aged & poore, he is exempted for the futureဦဝ[10] Beginning with the following yearမs tax list, he was taxed only to the parish. This is a particularly interesting record because it suggests that he was in his late forties when he first appears in the Surry County records in 1663, and well into middle age when he married and had children. That is not inconsistent with the times, when men generally married late in life, partly due to the severe shortage of women, if at all. On the same day he made his petition, his wife Rosamond proved the will of their neighbor Alice Jordan.[11] Rosamond would evidently die before her husband, sometime in the next four years.

John Bynum appears in only a few other records, of a mostly inconsequential nature. In January 1687/8 he accused a neighbor named Joseph Wall of killing his yearling cow.[12] After a two-month delay, a jury was formed, found for Bynum, and awarded him three hundred pounds of tobacco in damages.[13] The loss of the cow was probably a serious one. When he died a few years later, the bulk of his estate consisted of one calf and three cows, one of which was barren.

This is nearly our final record for John Bynum. He appears in the June 1690 tithables, and for the first time was in Southwarke parish, apparently having moved to be near his sons. He is not in the June 1691 tithables, and had likely died before that list was compiled. On 7 July 1691 his eldest son John Bynum Jr. was granted administration of his father·Äôs estate.[14] At the same court, appraisers were appointed and John Bynum Jr. was ordered to produce an inventory. On 1 September 1691, John Bynum Jr. ·Äúcame into Court and declared that the appraisement of the said deceds Estate was burnt the last night in his house which by some accident with all that he had in it was burnt.·Äù[15] The inventory finally produced on 17 May 1692 showed a small estate, valued at 2,460 pounds of tobacco. It included ·Äúone cow & calf, one barron cow, one yearling heipher, one old feather bed with a canvas ticking & ragged blkt, two old gunns, one iron pott & pott hooks, one brass morter & pestle & brass ladle, one brass spoon, some old bowles & trays, one grubbing hoe, one old coate, one pr of old shooes & old stockings·Äù and some lumber and gunpowder.[16] There was no mention of Rosamond, nor any indication of a trade other than farming. From later records, it is clear that John Bynum Jr., the eldest son, inherited his father·Äôs land.

Rosamond Bynum is mentioned in the records only three times, all between 1679 and 1687. Whether she was married to John Bynum fifteen years earlier is impossible to determine. Thus we cannot be certain that she was the mother of the children. There are no clues to her age or to her maiden name. Some researchers have proposed the theory that she was a daughter of George and Margery Blow, but that is exceedingly unlikely (see Appendix).

John Bynum had two sons, John and James, and evidently a daughter named Elizabeth who married Richard Blow and then Robert Grice.

1.1. John Bynum (1664/5 ·Äì 1715) John Bynum, son of John Bynum I, first appears in the tithables in his father·Äôs Lawnes Creek parish household in 1681, suggesting he was born sometime in late 1664 or early 1665. (Males were taxable if they had reached the age of 16 by June 10 of the tax year, meaning that John Bynum turned 16 between June 1680 and June 1681.) He is listed as a tithable of his father in 1681, 1682 and 1683. In 1684 he is a tithable to a neighbor, Richard Jordan Jr., perhaps as an employee or apprentice. In 1685 and 1686, when he may have been of age, he is listed further west in Southwarke parish as a tithable of Richard Blow, probably his brother-in-law. It appears that he and his brother James had both moved from their father·Äôs plantation to live on Richard Blow·Äôs land at Pigeon Creek His first appearance in other records is his witness to a deed for nearby land on 6 July 1686, using a signature mark significantly different than his father·Äôs.[17] On 16 January 1687, George Blow Jr. sold him 100 acres on Pigeon Creek, part of Richard Blow·Äôs plantation which he had just recently gifted to his brother George Blow.[18] John Bynum evidently lived on this land for the remainder of his life. John Bynum is listed with George Blow Jr. in the 1687 tithables, alone in 1688, and as head of a household which included Robert Grice in 1689. Whomever he married, it probably took place about this time. Thereafter he is listed alone in the Southwarke parish tithables through 1703, the last year they exist.

He was administrator of his father·Äôs estate in 1691.[19] During that process, his house apparently burned down. On 1 September 1691 he ·Äúcame into court and declared that the appraisement of the said deceds estate was burnt the last night in his house which by some accident with all that he had in it was burnt.·Äù[20] He eventually produced an inventory on 17 May 1692.[21]

Like his father, John Bynum Jr. appears in few records. He appears next as a witness to the will of Elizabeth Simmons in 1695[22], was paid by the county for some unknown service in 1699[23], and served on the first of several juries in 1700.[24] He is listed among the Surry quit rents of 1704 holding 100 acres, the land he had purchased in 1687. He appears very infrequently in the court records as a creditor or debtor, though he is more often a creditor for modest sums.

Two references suggest he was a tradesman of some sort, perhaps a carpenter: The county paid him modest sums for ·Äúmending ye courthouse·Äù in 1706 and for ·Äúmending ye prison·Äù in 1711.[25] In the next record of interest, on 18 February 1713 he was granted a license to keep an ordinary at Ware Neck.[26] This license was evidently renewed on 19 May 1714.[27] Whether he was using his own house is unclear, but Ware Neck was not far from his land on Pigeon Creek.

On 20 July 1715, his widow Ann Bynum was granted administration of his estate, making oath လthat the sd Jno. Binum departed this life without making any willဦဝ[28] John Bynum had died owing two creditors, who sued Ann Bynum to recover from the estate. One of the debts was nearly £25, a reasonably substantial sum. When the suits were settled in 1716 she owed a total of nearly £30 to two creditors, who were paid out of the estate.[29] Ann Bynum had remarried to Robert Warren by 28 January 1717, when she and her new husband filed a supplemental inventory.[30] On 20 May 1719 they filed a final accounting, indicating that the majority of the estate had been used to pay the debts.[31]

The identity of his wife Ann is unknown. In fact, we cannot even be certain that she was the mother of his children since the only mention of her was after her husband·Äôs death. Some researchers have surmised that she was a sister or daughter of Robert Grice, whose 1720 will devised land to his ·Äúwell beloved couzen John Bynam.·Äù[32] A close examination of the records discloses that this is extremely unlikely. Rather, it seems that Robert Grice was married to John Bynum·Äôs sister Elizabeth, the widow of Richard Blow, and that the ·Äúcouzen·Äù was his nephew. (see Appendix).

John Bynum had two sons, John and William. He may have had daughters, but the records don·Äôt offer us any clues that might identify any female children. Since he died intestate, his eldest son would have inherited his land. William Bynum was evidently the elder son, as a 1728 deed refers to the John Bynum land on Pigeon Swamp as William Bynum·Äôs.[33] Indeed, William Bynum sold that same land in 1730.[34]

1.1.1.William Bynum (c1690 ·Äì c1760) He migrated a few miles south of his father·Äôs lands, settling in Southampton County. This line is continued in Chapter 3.

1.1.2.John Bynum (c1695? ·Äì 1775) He migrated into the part of Lunenburg County which became Halifax and then Pittsylvania. This line is continued in Chapter 4. (See also the Appendix.)

1.2.James Bynum (1665/6 ·Äì c1723) His father appeared in all the Surry County tithables lists beginning with the earliest available list of 1668, but James Bynum appears for the first time in 1682, one year after his brother John. Males were taxable if they had reached the age of 16 by June 10 of the tax year, meaning that James Bynum turned 16 between June 1681 and June 1682. As the younger son, he may have been apprenticed to a neighbor named Marco McKinnie.[35] He was listed as a tithable of McKinnie in 1682 and 1683, in the same precinct of Lawnes Creek parish as his father. In 1684, he was listed as a tithable of George Morrell in the same precinct. In 1685 he and George Blow (Junior) were listed together, and his brother John Bynum was listed with Richard Blow, all in Southwarke parish. In 1686 he was back in Lawnes Creek parish, listed with Charles Savage. In 1687 he was again in Southwarke parish, listed with Richard Smith (who had married George Blow Sr.·Äôs widow). From 1688 through the final surviving tithables list of 1704, he was individually taxed in Lawnes Creek parish. He was also, along with his brother John, listed in the Surry militia muster of 1687.[36]

James Bynum appears relatively infrequently in the deed and court records of Surry County. His first recorded land purchase was on 5 January 1691 when, as ·ÄúJames Bynham, planter·Äù, he bought 150 acres from Luke and Elizabeth Mizell on the north bank of the Blackwater River.[37] Luke Mizell sold an adjoining parcel to his brother Lawrence at the same time, which James Bynum would eventually acquire as well. Having become a freeholder, he was then eligible for jury service and other privileges. He began appearing in the Surry court records shortly thereafter, as a grand juror for the first of several times on 5 September 1693.[38] He would serve as a grand juror again in 1699.[39] On 14 July 1793, his wife Elizabeth Bynum witnessed and proved the nuncupative will of their neighbor Luke Mizell Jr.[40] After the widow failed to produce an inventory, James Bynum and three other neighbors were appointed to appraise the Luke Mizell estate on 1 May 1694.[41]

On 29 April 1698 James Bynum purchased 7 acres from Edward Newby which adjoined the land he already owned.[42] In 1701 the land south of the Blackwater was opened for patents, and James Bynum appears to have claimed 250 acres which he had surveyed in 1702.[43] There was no subsequent patent issued for the land, suggesting that he apparently temporarily abandoned plans to moved across the river. A few years later, on 2 October 1703 he bought 100 acres adjoining his own land, the parcel that had belonged to Lawrence Mizell, from Lawrence·Äôs son Luke Mizell.[44] Curiously, there is no record of a subsequent sale of this land, and he evidently disposed of it almost immediately after the purchase. The 1704 Quit Rent roll shows him with only 157 acres, not the 257 he should have owned. This 157 acres was sold by James ·ÄúBineham·Äù his wife Elizabeth on 2 July 1706, when it was described as the 150 acres bought from Luke Mizell in 1691 and the 7 acres purchased from Newby in 1698.[45] He used as his signature in this deed a distinctive ·ÄúJB·Äù mark, which he also used when witnessing other deeds.[46]

At that point he appears to have moved several miles south of the Blackwater into the part of Surry that was later Sussex County, in what had been Indian territory until it opened for patents in 1701. As mentioned above, in 1699 he had claimed 250 acres in the area and had it surveyed in 1702, though he never received a patent for it.[47] However, on 7 Mar 1705/6 he had 330 acres surveyed south of the Blackwater, and three days later had another 140 acres surveyed.[48] Patents for both the 330 acres and 140 acre parcels were issued eight years later, on 16 June 1714.[49] The two parcels adjoined one another north to south.

He clearly lived on the land he surveyed in 1706, for all subsequent references to him show that he was living in southern Surry County. He was security for James Turner·Äôs management of the estate of an orphan named Phillip Baily in southern Surry according to his petition of 25 November 1711.[50] and appears in one or two debt cases with people living in that area.[51] The will of George Nicholson, dated 12 February 1712/13 directed his heirs to confirm a sale to James Bynum of land between the Nottoway and Meherrin Rivers (in what was later either Sussex or Southampton County).[52] There is no deed for that land, so it·Äôs not clear if the sale was consummated.[53] He was then granted another 100 acres on Flatt Swamp, several miles further south, in neighboring Isle of Wight County near the North Carolina line on 11 April 1719.[54] This patent, which may have been posthumous, is the last record of James Bynum.

James Bynum evidently died sometime after April 1718, when the Surry court records cease, and the Fall of 1723. On 16 September 1723, William Bynum and his wife Mary sold both of James Bynumမs two 1714 grants.[55] Several months later, on 21 April 1724, လWilliam Binam ofဦNorth Carilinahဝ sold the 1719 grant of 100 acres, describing it as a patent to လJames Binam deceased.ဝ[56] Note that James Bynumမs wife Elizabeth must also have been dead, else it would have been necessary for her to release her dower interest in these parcels.

Unfortunately, there are no Surry court orders for the period 1718-1741. James Bynum·Äôs estate records would have been among these missing records. Surry·Äôs wills do exist for the period, but there is no will recorded for James Bynum. Nor is one recorded in Isle of Wight County. He apparently died intestate, since it is clear that his eldest son was William Bynum, and it was he who inherited James Bynum·Äôs land. We can safely conclude that William Bynum was his son, and William Bynum·Äôs distinctive signature mark allows us to distinguish him from his first cousin of the same name. James Bynum·Äôs other children are inferred, but since we can distinguish the sons of his brother John Bynum, his children are clearly identifiable. James Bynum, by the time of his death, had moved considerably south of his brother, and his sons all seem to have moved into North Carolina at about the same time. I might also note that all the Bynums of Surry County used distinctive marks as their signatures, making it fairly easy to tell them apart. In addition, all three of the sons below migrated to the same area of Edgecombe County, North Carolina.

Elizabeth, the wife of James Bynum, was at one time thought by some to have been the daughter of Luke Mizell, but that seems extremely unlikely. No evidence exists that even hints at a relationship between the two families other than that they were neighbors for perhaps a three year period. (See separate explanation in the Appendix on the Mizell connection.)

1.2.1.William Bynum (c1690 ·Äì 1746) He appears to be the eldest son, based on his evidently inheriting James Bynum·Äôs lands. He migrated into North Carolina by 1724. This line is continued in Chapter 5.

1.2.2.James Bynum (1690s ·Äì 1763) That he was the son of James Bynum is suggested by geography, and by his association with William Bynum. This line is continued in Chapter 6.

1.2.3.John Bynum ? (c1700 ·Äì c1761?) The existence of a son named John is theorized, though he does not appear to have had children. Since it is unclear whether later references are to John, son of John (see 1.2 above), or to a second John Bynum (who must therefore be a son of James), the question is addressed in the Appendix.

1.3.Elizabeth Bynum (c1660? ·Äì by1720) We can make a reasonably good case that a daughter of John Bynum was the wife of, first, Richard Blow, and then of Robert Grice. She may have been his eldest child. This theory rests on two pieces of evidence: an apparent relationship between Richard Blow and the sons of John Bynum, and on the will of her second husband which calls a third-generation Bynum his ·Äúcousin.·Äù (See the Appendix for a more thorough and detailed explanation.)

·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî·Äî
William Bynum
Gender: Male
Birth: 1690 Isle of Wight County, Virginia Colony
Death: April 24, 1746 (56) Albemarle, Bertie County, Province of North Carolina

Immediate Family:
Son of James Bynum and Elizabeth Bynum
Husband of Mary Bynum (nee Fort)

Father of
William Bynum, Jr.
Mary Fort Bell
Luke Bynum
Rebecca Bynum
Isaac Bynum

Brother of
James Bynum
John Bynum

The progenitors of the Bynum family came from Wales early in 1600. The name partook of the Welsh and was spelled Beinheim, and from that to Binham, and then to Bynum. William (circa 1690), the great grandfather od Asa and John, Isaac's father and his brother came from England in 1735 and settled in North Carolina.

SOURCE- Genealogy of the Murphrees-Bynum Created by an independent genealogy expert for one of Parker Dometis Bullard's granddaughters.

==========
Origin of the Name ·ÄúBynum·Äù
https://genfiles.com/bynum/origin-of-the-name-bynum/

The various branches of the Baynham and Bynum families of America eventually developed legends that the name, and the family itself, originated variously in Wales, Scotland, England, and Ireland.¬â€  All of the immigrants mentioned herein, and all other colonial immigrants of the name who can be identified, were certainly English.
However, the name itself is of Welsh derivation, taking the Baynham and other forms in fifteenth century England among families of Welsh origin.¬â€ ¬â€  Many English surnames were formed from Welsh given names by prefixing the patronymic ·Äúab·Äù(before vowels) or ·Äúap·Äù (before consonants).¬â€  Eventually, the vowel was dropped and, for example, ap Hugh became Pugh, ab Owen became Bowen, and ap Rhys became Price.
One of the most common Welsh given names was Ennian (or, in more modern times, Enyon or Enion).¬â€ ¬â€  With the patronymic prefix ·Äúab·Äù, this name produced a great many English surnames. The Origin of English Surnames notes that ab Enyon ·Äúsurvives as Ennion, Eynon, Inions, Anyan, Onians, Onions, and Hennion and, compounded with ap or ab, as Pinnion, Beynon, Benian, Benyan, and Binyon·Ä¶ In 1455 in Worcestershire and in 1486 in Gloucestershire this acquired a pseudo-topographical form Baynham which still survives.·Äù1¬â€  A companion book by the same author gives the same derivation, adding that ·Äúin spite of appearance, Baynham is not local in origin.·Äù2 ¬â€  All authorities on English surnames seem to reject the notion that Baynham and its variants were derived from a place name.
T. E. Morris, in ·ÄúWelsh Surnames in the Border Counties of Wales·Äù, writes that ·ÄúEynon and Beynon have undergone curious changes in England, producing such divergent variants as Haynes and Onions and Baines, Baynham and Beniams·Ä¶ Baynham is an old Gloucestershire and Herefordshire surname.¬â€  The son of one Robert ap Eignon was Robert Baynham·Ä¶ Thomas Baynham was married in 1437, hence this is an early instance of the name.¬â€  Another even earlier instance of Baynham as a surname is [1421 in Herefordshire].¬â€  Thomas Baynham was the High Sheriff of Gloucestershire in 1476,¬â€  Laurence Bynion or Benyon or Benion or Bygnion was at the University of Oxford in 1581·Ä¶·Äù3 ¬â€  Note that all the referenced English counties border South Wales.¬â€  The same book lists Baynham, Banham, Beynon, Benniam and similar variants as originating in these border counties.¬â€  It does not list any version of Bynum at all.¬â€ ¬â€  Morris further notes that, in these particular surnames, ·Äúthe vowels are interchanged at will.·Äù4¬â€  Pronunciation of Baynham and its variants, as we know from contemporary poems that presumably rhymed, would have at times been pretty close to ·Äúbye-nom·Äù.¬â€ 5
The 1901 The Dictionary of English and Welsh Surnames repeats the same Welsh origin and calls Baynham ·Äúa Gloucestershire surname: ·Äú·Ä¶Robert ap Eignon had for his son Robert Baynham, of Chorewall in the forest of Dean.¬â€  Henceforward the family were so known·Ä¶ The name looks wonderfully English and local, but, as shown, is not so.¬â€  Beynon, Binyon, and Benyon are other forms·Ä¶·Äù6
The National Library of Wales, located in the charmingly-named town of Aberystwyth,¬â€  kindly provided two gentlemen to discuss this further some years ago.¬â€  While referring to the above authors, they added the observation that the Welsh patronymic produced different forms even within Wales.¬â€  For example, ab Enyon¬â€  tended to became Bennion and variations in North Wales, but Beynon in South Wales.¬â€  These gentlemen also pointed out that the Welsh use of patronymics continued well into the 19th century, so it is clear that derived surnames like Baynham developed outside Wales in the adjoining English border counties.¬â€  It is true, however, that in the last century or two, variants like Baynam, Beynom, and Bynom have occasionally appeared in South Wales as well as in the border counties.
The Visitation of the County of Gloucestershire Taken in the Year 1623, referenced by some of the authors above, contains a lengthy genealogy that begins with one Raffe ap Eignon of Gloucestershire¬â€  Several generations later, roughly in the year 1400, his descendents had adopted Baynham as the surname.¬â€  There follows eight generations of Baynhams, through the early 1600s.¬â€  (Alas, there is no evidence of a relationship with any of the Virginia Baynhams.)¬â€  The Knights of England lists four knights of this name, all spelled ·ÄúBaynham·Äù, three of whom are in the genealogy of Raffe ap Eignon.7
It seems clear, then, that ·ÄúBaynham·Äù was the dominant form of the name in the seventeenth century and that the Baynham immigrants to America (like most of that period) came from the southwestern counties or from the vicinity of London.
Surnames of the Earliest Immigrants
The surnames of the two earliest seventeenth century Virginia immigrants, John Baynham of Jamestown and Alexander Baynham of Westmoreland County (both of whom are discussed in Chapter 1) are most often recorded as ·ÄúBaynham·Äù.¬â€  This is surely due to the fact that both were literate and could sign their own names.¬â€  What copies of signatures we can find for them are rendered as ·ÄúBaynham·Äù.¬â€  The clerks who wrote their names into the records were perhaps either familiar with their signatures or were told how to spell the name.¬â€  However, the names of both men were sometimes¬â€  recorded as Baynam, Bainham, Baineham, and even Banum and Beanum.
A century later there came to Caroline County, Virginia another literate immigrant, William Baynham (also see Chapter 1) who, along with his descendants, consistently signed as ·ÄúBaynham·Äù, though the rendering of the surname by clerks on occasion exhibited nearly as much imagination.¬â€  The descendants of this immigrant, essentially all of whom were literate, continued to use the ·ÄúBaynham·Äù name in later generations.
Transformation of the Name in America
Two non-literate immigrants of the 17th century perhaps were named ·ÄúBaynham·Äù as well, though because neither was literate, the name was recorded by clerks in a different form.¬â€  These two immigrants were George Baynam of Maryland (see Chapter 1) and John Bynum of Surry County, Virginia (see Chapter 2).¬â€  Neither of these two men could read or write and so we have no example of a signature.¬â€ ¬â€  Their illiteracy undoubtedly contributed to the transmutation of their surnames.¬â€  In the case of the former, the surname was recorded as both Baynam and Banum but his descendants generally adopted Bainum and variants when they became literate.
John ·ÄúBynum·Äù of Surry County ·Äì 11 different spellings
John Bynum, who arrived in Surry County by 1663, is the progenitor of the large American Bynum family.¬â€  Neither he nor his sons were literate.¬â€  Lacking the ability to spell his own name, we find it recorded by numerous clerks in what appears to be a more or less phonetic rendering of ·ÄúBaynham·Äù.¬â€ ¬â€  John Baynham·Äôs name appears some 37 times in Surry County records, in eleven different versions ·Äì in order of frequency: Byneham, Bynham, Bynam, Bineham, Binam, Bynom, Bayneham, Binnom, Binham, Benham, and Benom.¬â€ ¬â€  Note that his name was never spelled ·ÄúBynum·Äù during his lifetime.¬â€ ¬â€  The ·ÄúBynum·Äù form of the name was rarely found, in fact, until his grandchildren and great-grandchildren, having learned to write, employed it as the preferred form.¬â€  While some styled themselves as Bineham and other variants, the great majority of the descendants of this man had adopted Bynum by the nineteenth century.
The name Bynum is thus a uniquely American name, used almost exclusively by the descendants of a single immigrant.¬â€  It is also a relatively unusual name. The first census of the United States in 1790 lists a total of 24 households headed by persons of the name (by one spelling or another) ·Äì one each in Massachusetts and Maryland, five in Virginia, fourteen in North Carolina and three in South Carolina.¬â€  At the same time, the name was virtually non-existent in England; only a handful of references pre-1790 can be found.
How do we determine the original surname of the Surry immigrant?¬â€  The answer, unfortunately, is that we cannot be absolutely certain.¬â€  But there are several good reasons to conclude that his name was actually ·ÄúBaynham·Äù or one of its close variants:
·Ä¢The form in which the immigrant·Äôs name is most often recorded by clerks (Byneham and variants) appears to be a phonetic form of Baynham, which would have been pronounced, roughly, as ·ÄúBynum.·Äù8¬â€ ¬â€  Indeed, his name is recorded on at least one occasion as Bayneham.¬â€  Among the other variations of his name, as recorded by the Surry County clerks, such as Benham and Benom, are mentioned in the above-referenced works as surnames with the same derivation as Baynham.
·Ä¢As Morris noted, families who used Baynham sometimes appear in early records as Bynion, Beynham, and other variants, and the same root name evolved in South Wales and the English border counties into Bynom.9¬â€ ¬â€  The name Bynom and Beynham seem more than coincidently similar to Bynum.¬â€  In fact, of those foreign-born immigrants named Bynam, Bynom, and Bynum appearing in the U.S. censuses of the mid-1800s, essentially all were Welsh.
·Ä¢The name Byneham and its variants is completely ignored by the authorities quoted above.¬â€  That is, the name in that form was almost entirely unknown in England (but see below)¬â€  Thus the odds are that the Surry immigrant·Äôs name was a phonetic rendering of some other name unusual enough that the clerks of Surry County were unfamiliar with it.¬â€  The surname that best fits that description is ·ÄúBaynham·Äù or one of its variants. ¬â€ I¬â€  also note that a similar transformation may have taken place in England a century or two later, when the English censuses of the mid-19th century recorded numerous households in southwestern England with similar surnames.10 ¬â€  As the National Library of Wales pointed out, both South Wales and the English border counties developed the forms Baynam, Beynom, and Bynom from the same root name by the early 19th century.
·Ä¢Finally, I would point out that the vast majority of immigrants to Virginia in the early and mid seventeenth century originated in either the southeastern counties (where Baynham originated) or the metropolitan area of London.¬â€  Thus it seems plausible that the Surry immigrant·Äôs name would have been prevalent on one of those areas.
There is an alternative explanation for the Bynum surname which, upon inspection, seems so unlikely that we can safely consider it implausible.¬â€  Some researchers have noted that a priory named Binham existed in early Norfolk County in northeastern England.11¬â€ ¬â€  Spelled ·ÄúBinneham·Äù in the 1086 Domesday Book, it eventually became known as ·ÄúBinham.·Äù¬â€  (There was also a town in Nottinghamshire called Bingheha, which eventually became spelled Bingham, then Byneham in the Vale.¬â€  However, all English surname authorities reject the idea that any surname developed from this place name.)¬â€ ¬â€  While it is possible that a similar sprang from the place called ·ÄúBinham·Äù, the reverse is also possible, for Reaney mentions Binham (Bineham) as a Norfolk surname among ·ÄúSurnames of Norwich Immigrants 1285-1350.·Äù12
If such a surname did develop in eastern England it was exceedingly rare compared to those of the southwest and west.¬â€  In fact, the surname Binham and Bineham does not appear to have survived in eastern England.¬â€  A search of English records of the 16th century uncovers only a few persons of that name, most of them in the southwest.¬â€  By the1851 English census not a single person of that name was enumerated, though many similar names existed in the western counties.¬â€  The 1861 English census listed no families in the vicinity of Norfolk named Binham, Bineham, Byneham, or similar, but several of that name in the west and southwest.¬â€  Thus it appears that the name in that form had an origin outside of Norfolk, more akin to Beynham, Beynom, and Bynom, than to the priory of Binham.¬â€ ¬â€  In any event, an origin in eastern England for the Surry County immigrant is considerably less likely than an origin in the southwestern counties.
Variations on the Name in Surry County, Virginia
To clearly illustrate that Bynum developed as a uniquely American name, I·Äôve noted below the distribution of the spellings of the name found in all 101 Surry County, Virginia records from the first occurrence in 1663 through 1700.¬â€  These citations were for the first two generations of the family in Surry, none of whom could sign their own names.¬â€  It seems obvious from this table that the clerks and magistrates wrote the name phonetically.
50 times as Bineham or Byneham
30 times as Binham or Bynham
13 times as Binam or Bynam
4 times as Binnom or Bynom
2 times as Binum or Bynum
once each as Bayneham and Benom
1P. H. Reaney, The Origin of English Surnames (London, 1967), pp318-319. [·Ü©]
2P. H. Reaney, A Dictionary of British Surnames (London, 1958), p32. [·Ü©]
3T. E. Morris, ·ÄúWelsh Surnames in the Border Counties of Wales·Äù, Y Cymmrodor, Volume XLIII (London, 1932), p108 and pp157-159. [·Ü©]
4T. E. Morris, p158. [·Ü©]
5Per the helpful staff at the National Library of Wales.¬â€  See also Bill Bryson·Äôs The Mother Tongue (William Morrow, New York, 1990) for a very readable summary of English pronunciation in the 17th century. [·Ü©]
6Charles W. E. Bardsley, The Dictionary of English and Welsh Surnames (London, 1901), p86. [·Ü©]
7William Arthur Shaw, The Knights of England (London, 1906), Volume II, p18, 41, 58, and 98. [·Ü©]
8Helpful gentlemen at both the National Library of Wales and the British Museum assured me in 1979 that the pronunciation was probably ·Äúbye·Äù for ·Äúbay·Äù.¬â€ ¬â€ ¬â€  It helps to recall that pronunciation of English vowels was often considerably different a few hundred years ago.¬â€  Several books on early English pronunciation, especially H. L. Menken¬â€  and Bill Bryson, make the same point. [·Ü©]
9Morris, pp158-159. [·Ü©]
10The form Bynum and variants appears very rarely in English records.¬â€  For example, the 1861 English census lists only 5 households rendered as Bynam, Binam, Bynom, Bynum, and the like but lists 90 households rendered as Baynham and Baynam.¬â€  ¬â€ As another example, Pallot·Äôs Marriage Index for 1780-1837 lists no persons named Bynum and similar, but 34 named Baynham.¬â€  Among such seventeenth century records as could be found, the Bynum form of the name appears to have been essentially nonexistent in England. [·Ü©]
11Its history is described in considerable detail by Francis Blomefield, An Essay Towards a Topographical History of the County of Norfolk, Vol. IX, (London, 1808). [·Ü©]
12P. H. Rainey, The Origin of English Surnames (London, 1967), pp334-335. [·Ü©]

===

Heeft u aanvullingen, correcties of vragen met betrekking tot William I Bynum Baynham?
De auteur van deze publicatie hoort het graag van u!

Tijdbalk William I Bynum Baynham

Klik op de namen voor meer informatie. Gebruikte symbolen:  grootouders    ouders    broers/zussen    kinderen