Family tree Cromer/Russell/Buck/Pratt » Thomas FitzAlan, Archbishop of Canterbury (± 1353-1414)

Persoonlijke gegevens Thomas FitzAlan, Archbishop of Canterbury 

Bronnen 1, 2

Gezin van Thomas FitzAlan, Archbishop of Canterbury


Notities over Thomas FitzAlan, Archbishop of Canterbury

Thomas Arundel414Denomination Roman Catholicstical career=== and financial leverage with the Crown during the dotage of Edward III, happily abandoning his student days at Oxford, from which he gained little pleasure.[1] A hugely wealthy near-sinecure, Ely seems to have captured the young bishop's genuine interest until his brother's political opposition to Richard II's policies both at home and towards France grew rancorous and dragged him in. In an extremely grave crisis, teetering towards civil war, 1386-8, the bishop found himself, at least in formal terms, right at the front of the dangerous attempts by five leading temporal lords to purge the king's advisors and control future policy.t, suspended from rule. Given Ely's wealth and ease, this promotion was clearly as much to do with status and consolidating the conspirators' control in the north as with remuneration.[2]erved twice as Lord Chancellor, during the reign of King Richard II, first, entirely against the king's wishes, from 1386 to 1389, and again from 1391 to 1396.[3] For whatever reason, the king, working his way astutely back into real authority, contrived to assure Arundel of his confidence right until the 'counter-coup' of 1397, when the archbishop was deceived into bringing his brother out of hiding under a royal safe conduct—to his death. Throughout his life Arundel was more trustful than was good for him. Despite his political preoccupations, which certainly led to him being largely absent from York, he has been credited with sponsoring a lively revival of personal religious piety in the northern province. Besides, as was to prove the case at Canterbury too, he was also a very good spotter of administrative talent.te of All England[4] The king's nomination seemed to wish him nothing but success. Yet, within a year, he was exiled by the king during Richard's fierce counter-attack against his enemies of ten years earlier, and was replaced by Roger Walden.[4]ruel, empty fate because Scotland during the Great Schism recognized the Pope in Avignon, already had a bishop in place and would probably never have accepted him anyway, even in peaceful times. However, shortly afterwards, he joined up with his fellow-exile Henry Bolingbroke. Although not soul-mates, they invaded England together and forced Richard to yield the crown to Henry IV. Arundel played a hugely prominent part in the usurpation and may have been the most hawkishly determined of all that the king should be removed entirely: whether he actually lied on oath to Richard II to lure him out of Conway remains altogether open to debate. The new regime of course secured the reversal of several of Richard's acts, including the pope's installation of Walden at Canterbury. Arundel returned to his primacy[4], while Walden—actually with the support of Arundel—was eventually translated to the important see of London. the front of government. At one point, he even took the sick king into Lambeth Palace itself for care. In 1405–06 he had to deal with the crisis with the papacy provoked by the king's decision to execute Richard Scrope, Archbishop of York who had participated in the Percy rebellion. Formally, under Henry IV, Arundel served twice as Lord Chancellor, first in 1399 and again from 1407 to 1410.[3] When Henry IV's son succeeded as Henry V, Arundel's influence at court decreased.t of the Lollards, the followers of John Wycliffe, who in his 1379 treatise De Eucharistia had opposed the dogma of Transubstantiation.01, which recited in its preamble that it was directed against a certain new sect "who thought damnably of the sacraments and usurped the office of preaching." (1913 Catholic Encyclopedia} It empowered the bishops to arrest, imprison, and examine offenders and to hand over to the secular authorities such as had relapsed or refused to abjure. The condemned were to be burnt "in an high place" before the people. This act was probably pushed through by the authoritative Arundel. Its passing was immediately followed by the burning of William Sawtrey, a London priest. He had previously abjured but had relapsed, and he now refused to declare his belief in transubstantiation or to recognize the authority of the Church.[5]constitutions to regulate preaching, the translation and use of the Scriptures, and the theological education at schools and the university.[5] In 1410, a body of Oxford censors condemned 267 propositions collected out of Wyclif's writings. These different measures seem to have been successful at least as far as the clergy were concerned, and Lollardy came to be more and more a lay movement, often connected with political discontent.[5]ere hanged also burned. Thereafter, executions were again few until the Tudor period. Arundel had a stroke which left him unable to speak shortly afterwards. Henry V, who had had uneasy relations with Arundel, installed Henry Chichele in his place.l,[6][7] in which he tied in 9th place with Hugh le Despenser.[8]

Heeft u aanvullingen, correcties of vragen met betrekking tot Thomas FitzAlan, Archbishop of Canterbury?
De auteur van deze publicatie hoort het graag van u!


Tijdbalk Thomas FitzAlan, Archbishop of Canterbury

  Deze functionaliteit is alleen beschikbaar voor browsers met Javascript ondersteuning.
Klik op de namen voor meer informatie. Gebruikte symbolen: grootouders grootouders   ouders ouders   broers-zussen broers/zussen   kinderen kinderen

Via Snelzoeken kunt u zoeken op naam, voornaam gevolgd door een achternaam. U typt enkele letters in (minimaal 3) en direct verschijnt er een lijst met persoonsnamen binnen deze publicatie. Hoe meer letters u intypt hoe specifieker de resultaten. Klik op een persoonsnaam om naar de pagina van die persoon te gaan.

  • Of u kleine letters of hoofdletters intypt maak niet uit.
  • Wanneer u niet zeker bent over de voornaam of exacte schrijfwijze dan kunt u een sterretje (*) gebruiken. Voorbeeld: "*ornelis de b*r" vindt zowel "cornelis de boer" als "kornelis de buur".
  • Het is niet mogelijk om tekens anders dan het alfabet in te voeren (dus ook geen diacritische tekens als ö en é).



Visualiseer een andere verwantschap

Bronnen

  1. Geni World Family Tree, via https://www.myheritage.com/research/reco...
    Thomas FitzAlan (born Fitzalan)<br>Gender: Male<br>Alias name: Thomas /Fitzalan/<br>Birth: Circa 1353 - Arundel Castle, Sussex, UK<br>Occupation: Bishop of Ely 1373. Chancellor 1386-1388 and 1391-1396. Archbishop of York 1388. Archbishop of Canterbury 1396., Archbishop of York, Archbishop of Canterbury<br>Death: Feb 19 1414 - Canterbury, London, Middlesex, UK<br>Burial: Feb 20 1414 - Canterbury Cathedral, London, Middlesex, UK<br>Father: Richard FitzAlan, 10th Earl of ArundelEleanor of Lancaster, Countess of Arundel and Warenne<br>Child: Katherine DeBourgogne (born Fitzalan)<br>Siblings: Richard FitzAlan, 11th Earl of Arundel, Joan FitzAlan, Countess of Hereford, John FitzAlan, 1st Baron Arundel, Alice FitzAlan, Countess of Kent, Eleanor Fitzalan, Ranulph FitzAlan (born Fitzalan)
  2. Geni World Family Tree, via https://www.myheritage.com/research/reco..., 27 januari 2019
    Added via a Record Match

Historische gebeurtenissen



Dezelfde geboorte/sterftedag

Bron: Wikipedia


Over de familienaam FitzAlan, Archbishop of Canterbury


Wilt u bij het overnemen van gegevens uit deze stamboom alstublieft een verwijzing naar de herkomst opnemen:
Elizabeth Cromer, "Family tree Cromer/Russell/Buck/Pratt", database, Genealogie Online (https://www.genealogieonline.nl/family-tree-cromer-russell-buck-pratt/P29875.php : benaderd 29 april 2024), "Thomas FitzAlan, Archbishop of Canterbury (± 1353-1414)".