Moreland tree » John "John Whitlock (Jr.)" Whitlock II (1585-1658)

Persönliche Daten John "John Whitlock (Jr.)" Whitlock II 

Quelle 1

Familie von John "John Whitlock (Jr.)" Whitlock II

Er ist verheiratet mit Sarah Hirsch.

Sie haben geheiratet.


Kind(er):

  1. Hannah Whitlock  1613-1661 
  2. John Whitlock  1624-1659


Notizen bei John "John Whitlock (Jr.)" Whitlock II

==concerns== '''It is uncertain whether this John was the father of Hannah. Further research is warranted. '''This John appears to be either the same as https://www.geni.com/people/Thomas-Whitlock/6000000027046777833 or his twin brother. Further research is warranted. ==links== * FamilySearch AFN LVBT-0V === GEDCOM Source === Age: 72-73 === GEDCOM Source === MH:S3 Ancestry Family Trees Onl ine publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members. Ancestry Family Tree http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=110860350 &pid=3146 -------------------- ==concerns== '''This Thomas appears to be either the same as https://www.geni.com/people/John-Whitlock-II/6000000001531365281 or his twin brother. Further research is warranted. -------------------- http://genforum.genealogy.com/hirsch/messages/367.html * Sarah Hirsch of Cholesbury, BKM ?1600's * Posted by: Peter Whitlock (ID *****1125) * Date: October 04, 2006 at 06:16:55 * For some years we have shown that John Whitlock who died in 1659 in CT could possibly have been married to Sarah Hirsch. There are now indications that the Baldwin and maybe Hirsch family came from Cholesbury in Buckinghamshire. Listed before is a an article '''from the December 2005 issue of the Whitlock Family Newsletter'''. If any knows of possible Hirsch/Whitlock connectionsin th e 1600's in Connecticut, I would be interested to hear from you. '''WHITLOCKS OF CHOLESBURY, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE''' * In her email of September 2, 2005, Janne Carter says: ** "David and I went toBuckin ghamshire Archives yesterday. It was not very fruitful, I'm afraid. This is what we have found absolute proof of, from the actual parish records. * A John Whitlock was born in Princes Risborough in 1 562. * A John Whitlock was born in Cholesbury in 1585 ** (probably his son, but no wife or mother's name available in either case) He is the one who died in CT. * A John Whitlock was born inCholesbu ry 1624 ** (probably son of the second John. He is probably the younger brother to Hannah and David.) * found no marriage registration for either John" * This information has the potentialof being the biggest break through we have had in years. ** If this information is the missing connection back to England for the Whitlocks of Connecticut (WHITLOCK09 chart) then '''the John Whitlock born in 1624 is more likely the John Whitlock who died in 1659''' as we know this John was quite young when he died and the John Whitlock born in 1585 would be too old. * This find has even more likely conne ctions to two other charts. ** We know '''Hannah Whitlock was married in 1636 to Joseph Baldwin''' (WHITLOCK31 chart) at High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire and *** therefore Hannah was likely from Buckin ghamshire and *** possibly a daughter of the John Whitlock born in 1585. *** Hannah and Joseph settled in Hadley, Massachusetts. I have other documents that indicate that Joseph Baldwin was born in Cholesbury which makes this connection even more likely. * Lastly there is the '''Rose Whitlock who married Abraham Parker in 1644 in Woburn, Massachusetts''' (WHITLOCK24 chart). ** A Rose Whitlock a nd a John Whitlock are shown together in Salem, Massachusetts in 1643 but not as husband and wife, and we have assumed that this John was the one who died in Connecticut in 1659. ** This puts John, H annah and Rose all in Massachusetts in the 1640's, all born between 1613 and 1624 and at least John and Rose being shown as having some connection to each other. * While I think the connection to John Whitlock of Princes Risborough is possible, I am leaving that aside for the time being. * If this speculation turns out to have substance, this would mean the descent could be as follows: ** F1) ''' John WHITLOCK''' *** '''b.'''1585 Cholesbury, Buckinghamshire, England *** -'''M'''- ?? ** G1) '''Hannah WHITLOCK''' *** '''b .'''1613? Cholesbury, Buckinghamshire, England? *** '''d.''' Feb.27,166 1 Milford, Connecticut, U.S.A. *** '''-M-''' Joseph BALDWIN b.1609 d.Nov.2,1684    (See WHITLOCK31 chart) Nov.10,1636 High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England ** G2) '''David WHITLOCK''' *** '''-M-' '' Ann (??)BIGGE Dec.29,1634 High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England ** G3) '''Rose WHITLOCK''' *** '''b.'''1623-25? d.Nov.30,1691 *** '''-M-'''Abraham PARKER b.1612? d.Aug.12,1685   (See WHITLOCK 24 chart) Nov.18,1644 Woburn, Massachusetts, U.S.A. ** G4) '''John WHITLOCK''' *** '''b.'''1624 Cholesbury, Buckinghamshire, England *** '''d.'''1659 Connecticut, U.S.A. *** '''-M-''' ?? d.1661? (P ossibly Sarah HIRSCH)       (See WHITLOCK09 chart) * I think this information from Cholesbury, Buckinghamshire is worth further research and hopefully Janne Carter will eventually be able to ac quire copies of the material she consulted. Buckinghamshire is not well documented in our files and this is likely why this connection has eluded us for all these years. Hopefully there will be land r ecords or Manorial files that can shed more light on this family. * It is interesting that Bulstrode Whitelocke's parents James Whitlock and Elizabeth Bulstrode were married in Beaconsfield, Buckingha mshire in 1602 (WHITLOCK02H chart). ** At least two of their children were born in the county, Mary in 1606 and Joan in 1609. ** In this case it was the Bulstrodes who werefrom Buckinghamshire, not the Whitlocks, who were from London by that time. ** James does not purchase Fawley Court in Buckinghamshire until 1617. ** There is nothing I have found that would hint at a connection between the se two families. * Our thanks to Janne Carter for sharing this find with us and I look forward to following this line of research as it progresses. I have noted this possible connection on the WHITLOC K09 chart with references on the WHITLOCK24 and WHITLOCK31 charts. I will be interested in comments from descendants of these families. SOURCE: X5670 Peter Whitlock Whitlock Family Association 47644 Forester Road RR#2 Sardis (Chilliwack) B.C. CANADA V2R 4M6 Tel:604/824-7450 Fax:604/824-4303 Email:(XXXXX@XXXX.XXX)-name.org Web site: http://whitlock.castlewebs.net/wfa/index.htm ********************** ****

Haben Sie Ergänzungen, Korrekturen oder Fragen im Zusammenhang mit John "John Whitlock (Jr.)" Whitlock II?
Der Autor dieser Publikation würde gerne von Ihnen hören!

Vorfahren (und Nachkommen) von John Whitlock

John Whitlock
1585-1658


Sarah Hirsch
1587-1661

John Whitlock
1624-1659

Mit der Schnellsuche können Sie nach Name, Vorname gefolgt von Nachname suchen. Sie geben ein paar Buchstaben (mindestens 3) ein und schon erscheint eine Liste mit Personennamen in dieser Publikation. Je mehr Buchstaben Sie eingeben, desto genauer sind die Resultate. Klicken Sie auf den Namen einer Person, um zur Seite dieser Person zu gelangen.

  • Kleine oder grosse Zeichen sind egal.
  • Wenn Sie sich bezüglich des Vornamens oder der genauen Schreibweise nicht sicher sind, können Sie ein Sternchen (*) verwenden. Beispiel: „*ornelis de b*r“ findet sowohl „cornelis de boer“ als auch „kornelis de buur“.
  • Es ist nicht möglich, nichtalphabetische Zeichen einzugeben, also auch keine diakritischen Zeichen wie ö und é.



Visualisieren Sie eine andere Beziehung

Quellen

  1. Geni World Family Tree, via https://www.myheritage.com/research/reco..., 21. Juli 2021
    Added via a Record Match
    The Geni World Family Tree is found on www.Geni.com. Geni is owned and operated by MyHeritage.

Historische Ereignisse

  •  Diese Seite ist nur auf Niederländisch verfügbar.
    Van 1650 tot 1672 kende Nederland (ookwel Republiek der Zeven Verenigde Nederlanden) zijn Eerste Stadhouderloze Tijdperk.
  • Im Jahr 1658: Quelle: Wikipedia
    • 8. März » Im Frieden von Roskilde verliert Dänemark seine Besitzungen in Südschweden an Schweden, welches damit seine größte Ausdehnung erreicht.
    • 14. Juni » Die Schlacht in den Dünen gewinnt eine französisch-englische Streitmacht unter Marschall Turenne gegen das Heer der Spanischen Niederlande, das Don Juan José de Austria und Louis II. de Bourbon anführen. Weil der Entsatz des belagerten Dünkirchen damit scheitert, kapituliert die Stadt am selben Tag.
    • 18. Juli » In Frankfurt am Main wird Leopold I. zum römisch-deutschen Kaiser gewählt.
    • 31. Juli » Aurangzeb setzt nach erfolgreichem Krieg mit den Brüdern seinen Vater Shah Jahan, den Bauherrn des Taj Mahal, gefangen und übernimmt die Herrschaft im Mogulreich.
    • 14. August » Der Erste Rheinbund entsteht als überkonfessionelles Defensivbündnis von Reichsfürsten gegen den deutschen Kaiser, den die Habsburger stellen. Frankreich schließt sich am 15. August an.
    • 8. November » In der Seeschlacht im Öresund im Zweiten Nordischen Krieg bleibt die niederländische Flotte der Republik der Sieben Vereinigten Provinzen gegenüber der schwedischen Flotte unter dem Befehl Carl Gustaf Wrangels siegreich.


Gleicher Geburts-/Todestag

Quelle: Wikipedia


Über den Familiennamen Whitlock

  • Zeigen Sie die Informationen an, über die Genealogie Online verfügt über den Nachnamen Whitlock.
  • Überprüfen Sie die Informationen, die Open Archives hat über Whitlock.
  • Überprüfen Sie im Register Wie (onder)zoekt wie?, wer den Familiennamen Whitlock (unter)sucht.

Die Moreland tree-Veröffentlichung wurde von erstellt.nimm Kontakt auf
Geben Sie beim Kopieren von Daten aus diesem Stammbaum bitte die Herkunft an:
Christina Moreland, "Moreland tree", Datenbank, Genealogie Online (https://www.genealogieonline.nl/moreland-tree/I504544.php : abgerufen 17. Januar 2026), "John "John Whitlock (Jr.)" Whitlock II (1585-1658)".