Scholar
Typist
(1) Zij is getrouwd met Albert Edward Gibbins.
Zij zijn getrouwd in het jaar 1930 te Wandsworth (RD), London, zij was toen 28 jaar oud.
(2) Zij is getrouwd met Arthur Piggott.
Zij zijn getrouwd in het jaar 1948 te Wandsworth (RD), London, zij was toen 46 jaar oud.
grootouders
ouders
broers/zussen
kinderen
Gladys May Ruffle | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) 1930 | ||||||||||||||||||
Albert Edward Gibbins | ||||||||||||||||||
(2) 1948 | ||||||||||||||||||
Arthur Piggott | ||||||||||||||||||
Gladys May Ruffle
Gender: Female
Birth: Circa 1902 - London Camberwell, London
Residence: Apr 2 1911 - London, England
Age: 9
Father: George William Ruffle
Mother: Elizabeth Ann Ruffle
Siblings: Percy Harold Ruffle, Doris Constance Ruffle
Census: County: London Series: RG14 Line: 5; Country: England Piece: 2355 ; Date: 1911-04-02 Family: 23550245 ; See household members
Household
Relation to head; Name; Age
Head; George William Ruffle; 45
Wife; Elizabeth Ann Ruffle; 43
Son; Percy Harold Ruffle; 14
Daughter; Doris Constance Ruffle; 15
Daughter; Gladys May Ruffle; 9
What is in the 1911 census?In common with the censuses that preceded it, it recorded the following information:- Where an individual lived- Their age at the time of the census- Who (what relatives) they were living with- Their place of birth- Occupation- Details of any guests on the night of the census- Details of any servants they hadAlso, depending on an individual’s circumstances, additional information could include:- Whether they were an employee or employer- Precise details of the industry or service they worked in- Details of nationality- Duration of their current marriage- Number of children born to that marriage- Number of children still living, and the number who had died- Details of any illnesses or conditions each family member had, and the date these beganFertility in marriage and occupational dataIn response to government concerns the 1911 census also asked additional, more specific questions to each household, about fertility in marriage and occupational data.The 1911 census and the suffragettesFrustrated with the government’s refusal to grant women the vote, a large number of women boycotted the 1911 census by refusing to be counted. There were two forms of protest. In the first, the women (or their husbands) refused to fill in the form, often recording their protest on the household schedule. In the second, women evaded the census by staying away from their home for the whole night, and so did not lodge their protest on the household schedule. In both cases, any details relating to individual women in the households will be missing from the census. For the family historian, a refusal to fill in the form (accompanied by a protest statement) at least registers the presence of a woman, or women, in the household. But the women who evaded the count by leaving their home for the night are entirely untraceable via the census. The exact number of women who boycotted the census is not known, though some people have estimated that it may be as many as several thousand.Under license from DC Thomson Family History