Let op: Getrouwd (??-??-963) voordat geboren (??-??-967).
Let op: Leeftijd bij trouwen (??-??-963) lag beneden de 16 jaar (0).
Let op: Was jonger dan 16 jaar (0) toen kind (Bouchard deMontmorency) werd geboren (??-??-957).
Blois, Loir-et-Cher, Orleanais
Blois, Loir-et-Cher, Orleanais
Let op: Partner (Bouchard de Montmorency) is 37 jaar ouder.
(1) Zij had een relatie met Archbishop d'Tours Hugh I Vicomte d'Chateaudun.
(2) Zij heeft/had een relatie met Bouchard I Seigneur d'Montmorency.
(3) Zij is getrouwd met Archbishop Tours Hugh I Vicomte de Chateaudun.
Zij zijn getrouwd voor 962 te 2nd husband.Bron 5
Kind(eren):
(4) Zij had een relatie met Ernaud de la Forte.
(5) Zij is getrouwd met Bouchard de Montmorency.
Zij zijn getrouwd te Montmorency, Oise, Picardie, France.
Zij zijn getrouwd in het jaar 969 te Seine et Oise, Picardie, France, zij was toen 2 jaar oud. Zij zijn getrouwd in het jaar 969 te Montmorency,Seine-et-Oise,France, zij was toen 2 jaar oud.Kind(eren):
(6) Zij is getrouwd met Hugh I Vicomte deChateaudun.
Zij zijn getrouwd in het jaar 963 te France.
The order & death dates of Hildegarde's husbands are somewhat confusing. I find support for her first two marriages in the order given (Ernaud de la Forte and Hugh I de Chateaudun) on the newgroup, soc.genealogy.medieval, in postings by Ed Mann and several others. Adrian Channing, who is a respected professional genealogist gives the third marriage for Hildegarde, along with her parents, which leaves no doubt as to her identity, although Adrian does not mention the prior marriages in her post.t Hugh de Chateaudun is the 2nd husband (agreeing with Ed Mann, although he does not mention the 3rd husband Beuchard de Montmorency). Many people do not have Geoffrey I-1/2 in the line, going directly to Geoffrey II, b. abt 991. This may be the case, but Ed Mann has Hugh d. bef 989, which would not fit with the 991 birth year; plus the fact that Hildegarde would have been close to 50 when Geoffrey II was born, which is not likely. I have taken the liberty of decreasing Hugh's lifetime from "bef. 989" to "bef. 969" in order to allow Hildegarde to marry Bouchard in time to have their son.id not die until 942, when she would have married Hildegarde's father.
Hildegarde de Château-Basset de Blois | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bouchard I Seigneur d'Montmorency | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) < 962 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ernaud de la Forte | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bouchard de Montmorency | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) 963 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hugh I Vicomte deChateaudun |
http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=28696621&pid=9541
aft 940, but must have been after marriage
no date, 2nd husb.