Er hat eine Beziehung mit Anna von Honsberg.
Kind(er):
Progenitor of all other Schönberg branches and flowering branches of the Sciiönberg family, our special attention; because he kept the honor of his knighthood pure, loyal to his lords, never wavered and secured and expanded the old family estate according to the principles of his house.\n\nHe was first mentioned in 1364> as a co-owner of the pledged Schellenberg Castle, then should he after a message from the main state archives from the year 13? 1 Voigt in Tharandt. Over the years, his reputation grew steadily, and with it the trust of his princes. Landgrave Balthasar of Thuringia gave him proof of this when he talked to Duke Wenzlauw of Saxony on June 8, 1379 and promised the son of the same Rcdolph his daughter Anna in marriage. He assured the same 2()(X) shock of Freiberger Groschen as a gift, for which the duke's house and city of Belzig were to prescribe her as personal belongings. It was stipulated that if the marriage had not been consummated within 8 years after the dukes had issued a reminder, the landgrave should pay 5UU0 shock of good Bohemian groschen in the event of refusal and answer for the house and town of Torgau. To secure this contract, the landgrave U used guarantors from the noblest and most respected families of the country, who made themselves binding according to the right of storage to see to the fulfillment of these conditions. Among these guarantors, who, at the behest of the dukes, had to move with horses and servants into a city of their choice and stay there until the contract was completely fulfilled, were the burgraves of Meissen and Leisnig, the count of Schwarzburg, Hans Von Miltitz, Hermann Von MalTitz etc. also Caspar Von Schonberg. 10 Since 1382 the same appears as a knight. In that year he had bought two estates in Schönberg, which had to be paid for Meissen Castle. In any case, as he wished to unite them with the main estate there, which he certainly owned in common with his brother, he had no doubt asked the princes to remove a burden which otherwise did not attach to manorial estates. His wish was granted and on ü. On August 1, 1382, the Landgraves and Margraves Balthasar, Wilhelm, Friedrich Wilhelm and Georg in Meissen exempted those estates from the mentioned tax for as long as the knight Caspar and his\n\n"J DA. Urk. Nr. 4271. This marriage was actually consummated later.\n\nHeirs owned those goods. 11 A short time later, Caspar bought a second part of Ditmarsdorf and Reynsperg and received the fief from Margrave Wilhelm on April 8, 1390. This prince also granted his brother and cousin, Henczhil and Peter Von Schonberg, out of special favor and grace, the entire hand in this property.y- In the same year he acquired the Vorwerk zu Neskowe (Nössige), which Hans Hecker had previously had in tenure, and on December 28, 1390 he received the fief letter from the burgraves BertHold and Heinrich zu Meissen. They call him their loved ones, loyal ones and commemorate his faithful service, they also give the aforementioned feudal allies their entire hand in this estate.13\nAt this time a fight broke out between King Wenzlaw and the margraves. There is no doubt that Caspar and his cousin Peter Von Schonenberg took part in it; because when, through the mediation of Counts Hans and Heinrich von Schwarzburg, an armistice was concluded on October 28, 1391 until Whit Tuesday 1392 and both parties were given up the hiring of guarantors to secure this contract, we find these two knights among the guarantors of Margrave Wilhelm. It was determined that as soon as the peace against the king was broken by the Meissners, every knight who stood surety for the margrave should head to Brüx with three horses, keep camp there and only leave that city with the king's will. H\n\nIt can be assumed that the knight Caspar also fulfilled his Lelms obligations in the other fights that occurred in his time, but we find nothing mentioned about this in the documents. According to the testimonies available, he was called in to important negotiations all the more frequently. He was present at Altzella on March 4, 1383, when Bishop Nicolaus von Meissen approved that his vassal and squire (cliens et armiger) Balthasak Von Maltitz donated interest to Kaufbach to the Meissner church and the monastery of St. Afra for the salvation of his soul,'5 he was also on June 2, 1388 in Rochlitz in the entourage of Margrave Wilhelm when he transferred ownership of the market town of Sybenlehn to the Altzella monastery together with a free hoof of land.'6 On September 10, 1389 he and his brother Henczctl were witnesses at a hearing, in which the burgraves Berthold and Heinrich von Meissen transferred some interest to the Altzella monastery in Diera,17 was also present on September 29, 1396 when the brothers Zcieüeler zu Jauverniez sold the Byk farm near Leubnitz to the same monastery 1s and when on January 21, 1401 the burgraves Heinrich and Meinher zu Meissen gave the brothers Von Grunenrgde an annual fee for Kleinprausitz.10\n\nCaspar made it his children's duty to care for the future of the family with the same zeal. At least we find that they continued to work in the same way on the preservation and expansion of their property, managed the goods together for a long time and only divided them when circumstances made it necessary, but at the same time they neglected the old fiefdom among themselves and especially with the Purschensteiner home to renew. We do not find out whether a specific old house rule required this, but we do know that these principles were followed by the descendants for a long time for the benefit of the family.\n\nFrom the documents, we learn nothing about Caspar Von Schönberg's domestic circumstances, since no property was left exclusively to his sons during his life. The eldest of the same, HeinRich, comes in a document from Burgrave Heinrich von Meissen dated 2d. November 1411 as a witness. In addition to him we get to know two more brothers, Hans and Friedrich, in 1422, then two others, Caspar and Dietrich, in 1423, to whom the youngest, Nicol, has been added since 1435. One of his daughters, whose first names we do not know, became the mother of the prince robber Kunz Von Kaufungen. After the enfeoffment with Reinsberg on December 13, 1411, the little Caspar Von ¡schönberg is no longer mentioned, so he may have died a short time later.\n\nIn the old family registers there is great confusion about Caspar, his sons and his fiefdoms. He himself is said to have died in 138t) and to have owned Purschenstein, Schönberg, Reinsberg and Sachsenburg. His son of the same name is said to have received Purschenstein and died in 140U, a second son, Hans Von Schönberg on Sachsenbmg, Schönberg and Reinsberg, is said to have been the father of Caspar St., who is said to have fallen in 142ü with 2 or even 0 sons in the battle of Aussig . These details are to be used in their entirety, because they attribute the Purschenstein and Sachsenburg estates to the Schönberg line, which according to reliable information were in the possession of their cousins at the time, but then they list names of which the contemporary documents know nothing. Although the reports from the first quarter of the 15th century are very incomplete and later the devastation of the Hussite war disturbed the usual course of business and traffic and probably destroyed some archives, we still have individual reports from that time, with which we are quite able to help Being able to determine with certainty the circumstances of the Schönberg Reinsbekger branch and the order of its members. Although the age difference between Caspar's sons is very great, so that doubts might arise as to whether they all (! were really brothers, it is clear according to a feudal document from 1423 that the 5 eldest of them were really brothers and later documents after 1435 clearly testify that Niclas, who was not mentioned until then, is listed as a sixth brother of the aforementioned, so far as they were alive at that time.In none of the existing documents is there a statement which contradicts this opinion, and if the two youngest brothers die about 64 years after their father, so this* is probably unusual, but by no means unheard of.So we stick strictly to the documentary news and thus assume that the knight Caspar von Schönberg auf Schönberg and Reinsberg 6 sons, Heinrich, Hans, Friedrich, Caspar, Dietrich and Niclas. The difference in age suggests that these children may not all have been born of one mother and the coat of arms on the memorial stones of the two sons Caspar and Dietrich, who were bishops in Meissen, strengthen our assumption that the father of the same had two wives . On the tombstone of the older brother, Bishop Caspar, the coat of arms of the Honsberge is attached to the right of the head, that of the carasse to the left, while the Sciiönberg coat of arms is located at the left foot end. On the memorial of his brother Dietrich we find the Sciiönberg coat of arms on the upper right, the Heinitz coat of arms on the left, the HonSberg coat of arms on the right and the KArAss coat of arms on the left. From this it seems to be quite certain that the mother of the older brother Caspar was born Honsberg, Dietrich's mother a Iieuíitz, but that the paternal grandmother of both came from the family of the Karasse. -Ä A confirmation of this view can be found in the deed of foundation of the Laurentiusvicarie in the Meissner Dome, as it was written by Bishop Dietrich Von Schönberg on October 24, 1471. renewed. Here it is determined that this vicarage should first be awarded to a member of the Schönberg family who is suitable for taking over the position; however, if one were not available, it should go to a Von Heinitz, then to a Von Kariss. If no applicant qualified for that office could be found here either, it should be given to one from the Honsberg family. -6 We therefore assume that the first wife of the knight Caspar Von Schonberg belonged to the von Honsberg family and had borne him his eldest four sons, but that his second wife, née Von Heinitz, was the mother of his two youngest sons, Dietrichs and Nicols, had been. We have no information about the burial place of the same. He was probably buried in the chapel of his family in Altzella, at least his son, Bishop Dietrich, donated an eternal lamp there.\n\nSpecial Lelm letters about the goods that Caspar left to his sons have not come down to our time. From later reports we see that she has the Schönberg family estate, Reinsberg Castle, together with the goods, courts and interest acquired by her father in Nössige, Elgersdorf, Seeligstadt and Niederschona, as well as the shares that he has in the goods and interest that are father had owned together with his uncles, Hans the Elder and Dietrích, inherited. These estates remained in the joint possession of Caspar's sons until 1-454, in whose hands they increased considerably. Caspar's eldest son\n\nHeinrich ??? Schönberg (10) appears on November 29, 1411, while his father was still alive, in the entourage of Burgrave Heinrich von Meissen, when he confirmed an exchange agreement between the pastor and Supan von Rausslitz. *7 Here he is listed among the witnesses as: “heinrich von Schonen Berg sat there selbis; " His father had probably given him the management of the family estate at the time.
Großeltern
Eltern
Geschwister
Kinder
Caspar von Schönbeerg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anna von Honsberg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||