Sie war verwandt mit Ludwig von Egisheim.
Kind(er):
Judith von Öhningen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ludwig von Egisheim | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judith (geboren von Öhningen)<br>Namen geboorte: Judith von SchwabenJudith von Öhningen<br>Namen gehuwden: von Schwabenvon Dagsburg<br>Bijnamen: Judith De WetterauJudith Berenger<br>Ook bekend als: Judith von ÖhningenJutta von OhningenJutta von SchwabenJuttade Thurgovie<br>Geslacht: Vrouw<br>Geboorte: Ongeveer 950<br>Overlijden: Tussen 1002 en 1022 - Dabo, Moselle, Lorraine, France<br>Begrafenis: Bouzonville, Moselle, Lorraine, France<br>Adellijke titel: Countess of Ohningen - Ongeveer 975 - Öhningen, Konstanz, Baden-Württemberg, Germany<br>Echtgenoot: Ludwig Graf von Dagsburg<br>Kinderen: Heilwig d'Egisheim (geboren von Dagsburg-Egisheim), Hugues de Dagsbourg, Mathilde de Verdun (geboren von Dagsburg)<br> Aanvullende informatie: <br> <br>LifeSketch: essentially the name of his wife is unknown. were twofold: first, Duke Konrad of Swabia already had an attributed wife named Judith (though this attribution was based on indirect evidence); second, the proposed marriage of Richlind to Konrad of Swabia was within canonically prohibited degrees of consanguinity, and would result in several such prohibited marriages contracted by their immediate descendants. (Consanguinity-based objections to any proposed genealogy depend on an argument from silence: if no known clerical objection to an apparently consanguineous marriage survives, then the marriage must not have been consanguineous--that is, one or both of the parties' proposed ancestry must be incorrect where they appear to overlap. Despite the uncertainty of such an argument from silence, the tracing of apparently prohibited marriages is a very popular way to test genealogical theories within the medieval aristocracy; it is used throughout Hlawitschka's book.) Both these objections were countered in a 1990 book by Donald C. Jackman, offering a new reconstruction of the earlier generations of the Konradiner, which diverged from earlier orthodoxy in crucial ways. [[2]] First, by inserting an additional duke Konrad into the genealogy as father of the Duke Konrad who died in 997, it was possible to marry Judith to the elder Konrad, freeing up the younger duke to be husband of Richlind. Second, placing both this father and son on a different branch of the Konradiner family tree, other than where they had traditionally been placed, reduced the apparent prohibitive consanguinity between Konrad and his alleged wife Richlind (from second/third degree to fourth degree). Since not all apparently consanguineous marriages disappeared with Jackman's revision, Jackman argued that, based on these consanguinities, and arguing from the absence of any contemporary records of clerical censure, some consanguineous marriages (fourth- and third-degree marriages) were customarily tolerated in Ottonian Germany despite their prohibition under evolving canon law. Finally, Jackman went further in revising the genealogy of the later Konradiner family, proposing an agnatic Konradiner descent to Rudolf of Rheinfelden (elected anti-king in 1077 during the Investiture Controversy; d. 1080), further supporting Wolf's thesis of a principle of inherited throne-right recognized in the Konradiner."
De FamilySearch Stamboom wordt gepubliceerd door MyHeritage onder licentie van FamilySearch International, de grootste genealogische organisatie in de wereld. FamilySearch is een nonprofit organisatie die gespnsord wordt door The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon Church).