(1) Er hat eine Beziehung mit Concubine(s).
Kind(er):
(2) Er ist verheiratet mit Gunnor (Gundra Gunnora) "not" de Crepon.
France
Sie haben geheiratet nach 0962 in Danish Wife-Christian marriage after 968.Quelle 27
Kind(er):
Ereignis (Partners ) rund 0953.Quellen 2, 3, 17, 32, 33
Ereignis (Partners ) vor 0953.Quellen 2, 3, 17, 21, 34
(3) Er ist verheiratet mit Emma Capet.
Sie haben geheiratet im Jahr 0960, er war 26 Jahre alt.
at least two times Ch-descendant
=========
WIKIPEDIA
=========
Source above, includes portraits, paintings, maps and other
items not below; and working links and updates, is
none found yet
=======================prior posts===============================
None unless below
Richard I, byname RICHARD The FEARLESS, French RICHARD SANS PEUR (b. c. 932--d. 996), duke of Normandy (942-996), son of William I Longsword.Louis IV of France took the boy-duke into his protective custody, apparently intent upon reuniting Normandy to the crown's domains; but in 945 Louis was captured by the Normans, and Richard was returned to his people. Richard withstood further Carolingian attempts to subdue his duchy and, in 987, was instrumental in securing the French crown for his brother-in-law, the Robertian Hugh Capet. [Encyclopaedia Britannica CD '97]---------------------------------------------Curt Hofemann, curt_hofe(XXXXX@XXXX.XXX), in a post-em, wrote:Not that you probably don't already have a ton of material on him but:942-996: Duke of Normandy [Ref: Monarchs, Rulers, Dynasties and Kingdoms of the World by R.F. Tapsell 1983 p202]Title of Duke, again, was not likely generally used by Richard I or his son Richard II, whose official documents style themselves "count of Rouen." Later eleventh century documents use the term Duke - and adopted for historical record. [Ref: William The Conqueror, The Norman Impact Upon England by David C. Douglas 1964]'Richard I and his new settler in-laws of the 960s were the winners who lasted. In becoming so they learned (and taught) two principles of success that marked them off from the Franks. They learned the value of a strong centralizing chieftain who could at least freeze the status quo once his own local chieftains had taken what they wanted. The more successful he was, the more chiefs attached themselves to him for just this: with his warranty, backed by his chieftains, their defeated enemies could not recover by violence what had been taken from them by violence. Thus were the Norman dukes 'settlers of quarrels.' Fearlessness was the necessary quality in such a coordinating chieftain, and Richard I, who has no encomiast of his deeds, has at least this sobriquet, 'the Fearless' Those who were great fighters and the ruthlessly, selectively violent, were the great centralizers among the threatened and rapacious Norse.' [Ref: Predatory Kinship and the Creation of Norman Power, 840-1066 by Eleanor Searle, University of California Press, 1988 -Charlotte's Web Geneology http://www.charweb.org/gen/rjones/d0042/g0000019.htm#I238]"RICHARD I, "the Fearless", Duke of Normandy, b. Fecamp ca. 933, named father's h. 29 May 942, d. 20 Nov. 996; m. (1) (Danish wife) Gunnor, d. 1027 or 1031, dau. of the forester of Arques, but betrothed ca. 945 & event. m. (2) 960 to Emma, d. ca. 968, dau. Hugh Capet ..., Count of Paurs. After Emma's death, m. (Christian marriage) Gunnor to legit. their children. ... By Gunnor, Richard had [RICHARD II]." [Ref: Weis AR7:110-111]"When in 942 William was murdered at the instigation of Count Arnulf of Flanders, his son Richard, still a minor, succeeded him. Louis IV and Hugh the Great each tried to sieze Normandy, and Louis took charge of Richard. He then ensconced himself at Rouen and Hugh took Bayeux, which still had a Scandinavian leader called Sictric. Richard escaped from his custody at Laon, retook Rouen, and called on another Viking leader, Harald of the Bassin, for help. The Normans under Richard were able to re-establish their autonomy and from 947 Richard governed in relative peace. In 965 he swore allegiance to the Carolingian king Lothar at Gisors. Richard's official marriage was to Emma, daughter of Hugh the Great; they had no children, but by his common-law wife Gunnor, a Dane, he had many. Richard II, son of Gunnor and Richard I, succeeded his father in 996, another son Robert was archbishop of Rouen from 989 to 1037 and Emma their daughter became queen of England on her marriage to Aethelred, a position she maintained after his death in 1016 by marrying Cnot (sic: Cnut/Knut...Curt). Gunnor's nephews and other relatives furthermore formed the core of the new aristocracy which developed in the course of the eleventh century. Unfortunately we know little about the internal organization and history of Normandy until the reign of Richard II, and this falls outside our period." [Ref: The Frankish Kingdoms under the Carolingians 751-987, by Rosamond McKitterick, London & NY (Longman) 1983 p238-239]During the minority of his (William Long-Sword) successor, Duke Richard, King Louis IV -- who was making an expedition into Normandy -- was captured by the inhabitants of Rouen and handed over to Hugh the Great. From this time onwards the dukes of Normandy began to enter into relations with the dukes of France; and in 958 Duke Richard married Hugh the Great's daughter. He died in 996. (Succeeded by Richard II.) [Ref: Gordon Fisher message to soc.genealogy.medieval 6 Nov 1996]One more minor item, ES II:11 indicates he was also buried at Fécamp.BTW,where did you get the day & month for his birth & death? [Note: The birth date is an unsourced item I picked up on World Connect, it has at least a 1/365 chance of being right. The death date is from AR, as the source indicates (AR refers to Moriarty's Plantagenet Ancestry, p. 10-11, 13). JW]Regards,
Richard I, byname RICHARD The FEARLESS, French RICHARD SANS PEUR (b. c.932--d. 996), duke of Normandy (942-996), son of William I Longsword.
Louis IV of France took the boy-duke into his protective custody,apparently intent upon reuniting Normandy to the crown's domains; but in945 Louis was captured by the Normans, and Richard was returned to hispeople. Richard withstood further Carolingian attempts to subdue hisduchy and, in 987, was instrumental in securing the French crown for hisbrother-in-law, the Robertian Hugh Capet. [Encyclopaedia Britannica CD'97]
---------------------------------------------
Curt Hofemann, (XXXXX@XXXX.XXX), in a post-em, wrote:
Not that you probably don't already have a ton of material on him but:
942-996: Duke of Normandy [Ref: Monarchs, Rulers, Dynasties and Kingdomsof the World by R.F. Tapsell 1983 p202]
Title of Duke, again, was not likely generally used by Richard I or hisson Richard II, whose official documents style themselves "count ofRouen." Later eleventh century documents use the term Duke - and adoptedfor historical record. [Ref: William The Conqueror, The Norman ImpactUpon England by David C. Douglas 1964]
'Richard I and his new settler in-laws of the 960s were the winners wholasted. In becoming so they learned (and taught) two principles ofsuccess that marked them off from the Franks. They learned the value of astrong centralizing chieftain who could at least freeze the status quoonce his own local chieftains had taken what they wanted. The moresuccessful he was, the more chiefs attached themselves to him for justthis: with his warranty, backed by his chieftains, their defeated enemiescould not recover by violence what had been taken from them by violence.Thus were the Norman dukes 'settlers of quarrels.' Fearlessness was thenecessary quality in such a coordinating chieftain, and Richard I, whohas no encomiast of his deeds, has at least this sobriquet, 'theFearless' Those who were great fighters and the ruthlessly, selectivelyviolent, were the great centralizers among the threatened and rapaciousNorse.' [Ref: Predatory Kinship and the Creation of Norman Power,840-1066 by Eleanor Searle, University of California Press, 1988-Charlotte's Web Geneologyhttp://www.charweb.org/gen/rjones/d0042/g0000019.htm#I238]
"RICHARD I, "the Fearless", Duke of Normandy, b. Fecamp ca. 933, namedfather's h. 29 May 942, d. 20 Nov. 996; m. (1) (Danish wife) Gunnor, d.1027 or 1031, dau. of the forester of Arques, but betrothed ca. 945 &event. m. (2) 960 to Emma, d. ca. 968, dau. Hugh Capet ..., Count ofPaurs. After Emma's death, m. (Christian marriage) Gunnor to legit.their children. ... By Gunnor, Richard had [RICHARD II]." [Ref: WeisAR7:110-111]
"When in 942 William was murdered at the instigation of Count Arnulf ofFlanders, his son Richard, still a minor, succeeded him. Louis IV andHugh the Great each tried to sieze Normandy, and Louis took charge ofRichard. He then ensconced himself at Rouen and Hugh took Bayeux, whichstill had a Scandinavian leader called Sictric. Richard escaped from hiscustody at Laon, retook Rouen, and called on another Viking leader,Harald of the Bassin, for help. The Normans under Richard were able tore-establish their autonomy and from 947 Richard governed in relativepeace. In 965 he swore allegiance to the Carolingian king Lothar atGisors. Richard's official marriage was to Emma, daughter of Hugh theGreat; they had no children, but by his common-law wife Gunnor, a Dane,he had many. Richard II, son of Gunnor and Richard I, succeeded hisfather in 996, another son Robert was archbishop of Rouen from 989 to1037 and Emma their daughter became queen of England on her marriage toAethelred, a position she maintained after his death in 1016 by marryingCnot (sic: Cnut/Knut...Curt). Gunnor's nephews and other relativesfurthermore formed the core of the new aristocracy which developed in thecourse of the eleventh century. Unfortunately we know little about theinternal organization and history of Normandy until the reign of RichardII, and this falls outside our period." [Ref: The Frankish Kingdoms underthe Carolingians 751-987, by Rosamond McKitterick, London & NY (Longman)1983 p238-239]
During the minority of his (William Long-Sword) successor, Duke Richard,King Louis IV -- who was making an expedition into Normandy -- wascaptured by the inhabitants of Rouen and handed over to Hugh the Great.From this time onwards the dukes of Normandy began to enter intorelations with the dukes of France; and in 958 Duke Richard married Hughthe Great's daughter. He died in 996. (Succeeded by Richard II.) [Ref:Gordon Fisher ((XXXXX@XXXX.XXX)) message to soc.genealogy.medieval 6Nov 1996]
One more minor item, ES II:11 indicates he was also buried at Fécamp.
BTW,where did you get the day & month for his birth & death? [Note: Thebirth date is an unsourced item I picked up on World Connect, it has atleast a 1/365 chance of being right. The death date is from AR, as thesource indicates (AR refers to Moriarty's Plantagenet Ancestry, p. 10-11,13). JW]
Regards,
Curt
Richard I "The Fearless" of ADD Normandy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concubine(s) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) > 962 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gunnor (Gundra Gunnora) "not" de Crepon | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) 960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Emma Capet |
ancestry.com
Date of Import: 21 Feb 1999/ Not Given
Date of Import: 28 Mar 1999/ Not Given
Ancestral File is a collection of genealogical information taken from Pedigree Charts and Family Group Records submitted to the Family History Department since 1978. The information has not be en verified against any official records. Since the information in Ancestral File is contributed, it is the responsibility of th ose who use th file to verify its accuracy./ Family History Library
If you find inaccurate information in Ancestral File, use the F3 Edit key to make corrections. Save the corrections on a diskett e and mail the diskette to :
Family History Department
Attn: Ancestral File Contributions
50 E North Temple St
Salt Lake City UT 84150
Please Note:
Names and addresses of submitters to Ancestral File and those wh o have a research insterest are provided to help in the coordina tion of research. The use of this information for any other purp ose, including commercial use, is strictly prohibited.
no parents/ Not Given (See Notes)
c933
no date "association"/ Not Given (See Notes)
no date "association"/ Not Given
no date/place/ Not Given