Æthelberht died on 24 February 616 and was buried in the church of St Peter and St Paul (later St Augustine's Abbey) but was later exhumed so his shrine could be placed above the high altar of the Norman church to which St Æthelberht attracted pilgrimage.
Er hat eine Beziehung mit Bertha De Kent.
Kind(er):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%86thelberht_of_Kent
http://trees.ancestry.com/tree/17681926/person/937082018/photo
Ethelbert (Aethelbyrth) King Kent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bertha De Kent |
http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=75649477&pid=7006/ Ancestry.com
Death and succession[edit]\r\n\u00C6thelberht died on 24 February 616 and was buried in the church of St Peter and St Paul (later St Augustine's Abbey) but was later exhumed so his shrine could be placed above the high altar of the Norman church to which Saint \u00C6thelberht attracted pilgrimage. He was succeeded by his son, Eadbald, who was not a Christian\u2014Bede says he had been converted but went back to his pagan faith,[33] although he ultimately did become a Christian king.[49] Eadbald outraged the church by marrying his stepmother, which was contrary to Church law, and by refusing to accept baptism.[13]\r\n\r\nS\u00E6berht of the East Saxons also died at approximately this time, and he was succeeded by his three sons, none of whom were Christian. A subsequent revolt against Christianity and the expulsion of Mellitus, their bishop, may have been a reaction to Kentish overlordship after \u00C6thelberht\u2019s death as much as a pagan opposition to Christianity.[50]\r\n\r\nIn addition to Eadbald, it is possible that \u00C6thelberht had another son, \u00C6thelwald. The evidence for this is a papal letter to Justus, archbishop of Canterbury from 619 to 625, that refers to a king named Aduluald, who is apparently different from Audubald, which refers to Eadbald. There is no agreement among modern scholars on how to interpret this: \"Aduluald\" might be intended as a representation of \"\u00C6thelwald\", and hence an indication of another king, perhaps a sub-king of west Kent;[19] or it may be merely a scribal error which should be read as referring to Eadbald.[51] \r\n\r\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%86thelberht_of_Kent/ Ancestry.com