Ancestral Glimpses » Ancher Chevauchesul lord of Tetsworth (1116-1145)

Persönliche Daten Ancher Chevauchesul lord of Tetsworth 

• Er wurde geboren im Jahr 1116 in Tetsworth, Oxfordshire, ENGLAND.
• Alternative: Er wurde geboren rund 1116 in Normandy, FRANCE.
• Er ist verstorben im Jahr 1145 in Tetsworth, Oxfordshire, ENGLAND, er war 29 Jahre alt.
• Ein Kind von Arthur Chevauchesul und Mabilia d'Oiley
• Diese Information wurde zuletzt aktualisiert am 1. April 2017.

Familie von Ancher Chevauchesul lord of Tetsworth

Er ist verheiratet mit Mabilia Talesmache.

Sie haben geheiratet im Jahr 1141 in Tetsworth, Oxfordshire, ENGLAND, er war 25 Jahre alt.

Kind(er):

1. Robert Chevauchesul  ± 1125-????
2. Roger Chevauchesul  ± 1128-????
3. Matilda Chevauchesul  ± 1133-???? 
4. Emma Chevauchesul  1142-1200 

Notizen bei Ancher Chevauchesul lord of Tetsworth

Excerpts From
Memorials of the Danvers family (of Dauntsey and Culworth)
By Francis Nottidge MacNamara
From charters which are amongst those included in the register of Thame Abbey, we learn that early in the twelfth century there lived at Tetsworth a certain Awcher Chevauchesul with his wife Mabilia and their sons, Robert and Roger, and daus., Emma and Matilda. Of Awcher Chevauchesul we know no more than is told us by the mention made of him in the Tetsworth charters and by his name. That he was a Norman there can be no doubt. Was he an archer who rode upon a horse, Archer Chevauchesul, one of the mounted archers who were found amongst the Norman cavalry? He was, so far as our records witness, the first of his name in England; and as his son Robert was born about the year 1125, Awcher Chevauchesul may have been born towards the end of the eleventh century. Not improbably he was a countryman of Bishop Alexander's, and, as a loyal and trusty soldier, may have been placed by the Bishop in the lordship of Tetsworth to watch and ward his interests on the Oxford and Wallingford roads. His wife's name was Mabilia, and it is probable that she was a Talemasche of the ancient Saxon family of that name, for in the year 1199 we find her grandßchildren, Ralph de Auners and Richard Talemasche, together paying in Essex ten marks that they may have the lands of their ancestors. Awcher Chevauchesul was lord of Tetsworth, and Anthony a Wood tells us that his family were also lords of Hampton, near Dorchester, in Oxfordshire, which hence was called Chevauchesul-Hampton, shortened into Chesilhampton. But at Tetsworth the Chevauchesul family lived, and it is likely that the plan of the village in their day was much as at present. On the ridge by the wayside, at the entrance to the village, stood the church, and probably the priest's house was placed a little to the west of it, on the site of the present vicarage. To the north of the church, between it and 'the Napp,' overlooking the latter, would stand the manor-house, with the village street beyond, the houses as now stretching along the left-hand side of the road. Around the manor-house and church, and extending down the southern slope of the hill, would stretch the lord's demesne, while on the northern slope, and between it and the village street, would lie the common field, extending to the site of the present manor-farm, divided into parallel strips, or allotments as we should now call them, for the use of the villeins, or upper class of villagers. If the village boasted in those early times a hostel, it probably stood near the entrance to the village, on or near the site of the Swan Hotel; beyond the hostel was the common pasture-land. As for the road, though a king's highway, it was but a rough, unmetalled track, passable for horsemen and litters, rarely traversed by wheel carriages, save by the village carts. The houses that bordered it were but sorry huts of timber and mud, having neither window nor chimney, the smoke from the fire finding its way out by a hole in the roof or through the door, and in the way of furniture boasting nothing beyond the cooking utensils, a bench, and possibly a plank bed; outside, in front of each hut, would be a heap of refuse, the playground of fowls and pigs and children, but much valued as a manure.
Like their lord, many of the villagers were Normans, for it must be remembered that the Norman lords of English lands were living amongst a hostile people, and could not have maintained their foothold, but that they brought with them from Normandy vassals, whom they settled in the English villages.
The manor-house may have been built of stone, for stone of an easily-worked sort was close at hand; but more probably it was of the timber and plaster work of the period, and consisted mainly of the hall. The hall had a high-pitched roof, supported by a central row of rests or pillars, in the middle of which was an aperture, through which escaped the smoke from the hearth below. At the lower end of the hall was a porch or vestibule, and on the further side of this the buttery and the kitchen. At the upper end of the hall the floor was raised to form the dais, on which was placed the table for the lord, his family, and visitors of good degree. But the table consisted merely of boards laid upon trestles, and was removed after each meal. Such, too, was the table in the body of the hall, which served for the servants and chance visitors. All, lord and servants alike, sat upon benches, for chairs had not yet become a fashion. The windows of the hall were unglazed, and guarded merely by wooden shutters; the floor was of earth, littered at night with straw or rushes to form the common sleeping-place of servants, guests, and the younger members of the family. An opening near the dais led by a wooden staircase into a tower built against the wall of the hall, the lower story of which formed the cellar, and the upper ' the solar,' the sunny room, the bedroom and only private apartment of the lord and lady. Its scanty furniture consisted of a bed, a bench, a chest or hutch, in which were kept the valuables of the family, and a couple of perches, on one of which the clothes were hung, while on the other the falcons roosted. The floor was boarded, but not carpeted, and the door and the unglazed window were protected by curtains. Probably the solar could boast a fireplace and chimney; yet, despite the fire, it must have been in winter a miserable lodging. And, indeed, all the arrangements of the house were such that we in these days may well wonder that any but the very hardiest of our ancestors survived the conditions of their childhood. The house was no doubt surrounded by a moated wall or hedge, within which were included the garden and stables.
In such a house as this, in the early part of the twelfth century, lived Aucher Chevauchesul, lord of Tetsworth, his wife Mabilia, their sons, Robert and Roger, and daus., Matilda and Emma. Robert, the eldest son, md. Matilda Matildas or Maudes were many in those days Roger, the second son, became a monk; Matilda, the dau., md. Peter Talemasche, of the neighboring village of Stoke-Talmage; while Emma md. William Danvers, and eventually was heiress to her brother Robert, who left no children. William and Emma Danvers had sons Robert, Ralph, William, Roger, and Walter; we do not know of any daus.
The earliest of the Tetsworth charters of the Thame Abbey-register are two of Robert Chevauchesul, to one of which Robert Dauers, doubtless Robert, the father of William Danvers, signs his name as a witness. We find William's name attached as a witness to four of the earlier charters in the registerat page 6 to one of Robert le Gait, grandson of the founder of the abbey; at page 36 to one of John de Horsendun; at page 37 to one of Richard Talemasche (his wife's nephew?); at page 39 to one of Henry de Witefeld. Careful study of the charters evidences that these are early charters, given prior to the time when the younger Robert Danvers and his brothers Ralph, William, Roger, and Walter began to sign as witnesses to the family and other deeds.
Unfortunately, ancient charters are more often than not undated; the people to whom they were given trusted to the recognition of some of the many witnesses whom they were careful to procure, and they took care on the death of a donor to have his charter confirmed by his heir. Hence, too often we are left without data by means of which we can learn the donor's period. But, fortunately, even at this distant period we can sometimes by attention to the names of the witnesses arrive at the date of a charter. Thus there is a charter of Robert Chevauchesul's which he gave to the abbey, beginning 'Ego Robertus Chevauchesul assensu Matildis uxoris sui dedit residuum terre sui in Horsendun,' etc., and to this charter follows its confirmation by the suzerain, the Bishop of Lincoln: 'Alexander Lincolnee Episcopus, etc., confirmaverunt Everard Abbati de Parco Tama illam hidam quam Robt Chevauchesul dedit,' etc. Now, amongst the witnesses to the Bishop's confirmatory document is David, Archdeacon of Bucks, and as he was archdeacon bet. 1145 and 1171, and as Bishop Alexander held the see from 1123 to 1147, the deed must have been signed bet. 1145 and 1147; and as Robert Chevauchesul must have been of age when he gave the charter, we conclude that he was born not later than 1124 or 1125. The date receives confirmation from the circumstance that we find mention of Robert Chevauchesul's name in many contemporary documents during the latter half of the twelfth century, but none aft. 1202. We may, therefore, suppose that he died about that time at the age of seventy-five or seventy-six.
In another of these charters Robert, Bishop of Lincoln, confirms the donation which Robert Chevauchesul, with the consent of his mother Mabilia, and his brother Roger, and all his sisters, had made to the abbey, and amongst the witnesses to the deed is Robert, Archdeacon of Oxon. Now, as Robert the bishop held the See of Lincoln from 1147 to 1167, and as Robert the archdeacon was Archdeacon of Oxon from 1151 to 1167, we learn that Robert Chevauchesul, his mother and brother and sisters were alive, and as all give their consent to the grant, the brother and sisters were presumably of age, at some time bet. 1151 and 1167.

---------------------------------------------
About Awcher Chevauchesul
From the charters at Thame Abbey, we learn that Awcher Chevauchesul lived in Tetsworth with his wife Mabilia and their children Robert, Roger, Emma and Matilda. Awcher is the first Chevauscheul recorded in England, and may have come with the Norman invasion. Chevauchesel was a uniquely Norman descriptive name that means "who rode upon a horse," and Awcher is believed to be derived from "archer." If this theory is true, Awcher's birth name has been lost to history, and he carried his job description with the Norman cavalry as his name for the rest of his life.
Another theory for the origins of this family is found on http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=63774, which proposes that Awcher was possibly the son of Robert who held of the bishop in Banbury, Cropredy, and Wickham.
The Chevauscheul family is closely related to the d'Anvers/Danvers family. Robert Chevauscheul's sister Emma married William d'Anvers ca.1145. William d'Anvers was the son of Robert d'Anvers, who witnessed Robert Chevauscheul's charter to Thame Abbey. Robert d'Anvers was the great-nephew of Alexander, Bishop of Lincoln, who gained that position in 1123. Robert d'Anvers grand-father was Sir Ralph of Little Marlow. His grand-mother was the sister of Alexander, Bishop of Lincoln.

Awcher Chevauchesul
Born: abt. 1116
Tetsworth, [parish], Oxfordshire, England
Died: 1145
Tetsworth, [parish], Oxfordshire, England
Taken from http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=63774
TETSWORTH does not appear by name in the Domesday survey, but its lands were included in the Bishop of Lincoln's Thame manor of 60 hides. It is probable that it was represented mainly by the 10 hides held by a certain Robert, one of the bishop's knights, (fn. 45) and that he is to be identified with the Robert who held of the bishop in Banbury, Cropredy, and Wickham. (fn. 46) He may very possibly have been the father of Aucher Chevauchesul, who flourished at Tetsworth in the first half of the 12th century, (fn. 47) and the grand-father of Robert Chevauchesul. This last was in possession of Tetsworth by ca. 1146, (fn. 48) and Tetsworth must have been included in the 3 fees he was holding of the Bishop of Lincoln in 1166. (fn. 49) The date of his death is uncertain, but he appears to have been alive in 1201. (fn. 50) At that date he was holding only 1 out of his 3 Oxfordshire fees; the other 2 fees had been for some time in the possession of his two sisters Emma and Maud. (fn. 51) Maud had md. Peter Talemasch, (fn. 52) possibly the son of Hugh Talemasch of Stoke Talmage, (fn. 53) and himself lord of Stoke. (fn. 54) Peter, however, had died by 1181, (fn. 55) and Maud must have died before 1198, for it was their son Richard who was then in possession of half the Tetsworth fee. (fn. 56) In this year (1198–99) he and Robert Danvers, the heir to a moiety of the Tetsworth and Epwell fees, were engaged in an assize of mort d'ancestor over two of their Oxfordshire fees, a suit which may have had some connection with Peter's debts to the Jews recorded in the same year. (fn. 57) Richard md. Avice Taillard, a sister of Richard Taillard who frequently witnesses charters with him, (fn. 58) and appears to have died in or bef. 1205, when his son and heir Peter is found in possession of a ½-fee at Finstock in Charlbury, a part of his father's property. (fn. 59) In 1209–12 Peter Talemasch and Robert Danvers were returned as joint lords of Tetsworth; Talemasch was said to hold a ¾-fee. (fn. 60) When a survey of the bishop's Thame manors was made ca. 1225 Peter Talemasch was still holding. (fn. 61) Robert Danvers's share had descended to him from William Danvers of Bourton and Chislehampton, who had acquired it by his marriage with Emma Chevauchesul. (fn. 62) William Danvers was one of Henry II's knights, and it has been plausibly suggested that he may have supported the king against Becket, since he was omitted from Thame Abbey's prayers for his family. (fn. 63) Robert the son of William and Emma had succeeded by ca. 1197, and his younger brother Ralph was then holding part of Tetsworth of him. (fn. 64) Robert was a man of some standing: he acted as king's assessor in Oxfordshire in 1200. (fn. 65) He was still holding the Tetsworth fee in 1209–12, (fn. 66) but on the marriage of his eldest son Geoffrey before 1222 he gave 1½ fee, including his Tetsworth fee, as dowry for Geoffrey's wife Sara. (fn. 67) Both Geoffrey and his father were dead by the time of the Lincoln survey (ca. 1225), when William Danvers, Geoffrey's brother and heir, was recorded as holder of the Tetsworth fee. (fn. 68) From a final concord made in May 1225 it appears that Geoffrey died bef. 1225, for by then Sara had already taken a second husband. (fn. 69) William Danvers seems to have died bef. 1247. (fn. 70) He was followed by his eldest son Robert, who in 1279 held the Tetsworth and Epwell fees including the land once held by the Talemasches. (fn. 71) In 1305 it was specifically stated that Robert Danvers was heir to Peter Talemasch's fee. (fn. 72) A 14th-century record shows that Robert's son Simon held both the Danvers and Talemasch fees and that each contained property in both Tetsworth and Epwell. (fn. 73) Simon had subinfeudated his Tetsworth land which was mainly held by Thame Abbey. (fn. 74) In 1316 Simon Danvers and the Abbot of Thame were returned as joint lords of Tetsworth and in that year Simon was summoned for military service as one of the lords of Tetsworth, Epwell and Swalcliffe, Drayton, Stadhampton, and other lands. (fn. 75) Simon lived unt. at least 1327 (fn. 76) but before his death he disposed of some of his Tetsworth property. In 1321 he gave some 4½ virgates and a 2/3-fee there to Geoffrey de Stokes and his wife Alice, who may have been Simon's daughter, with remainder to their son Geoffrey. (fn. 77) In 1336 John de Wheatfield acquired the 2/3-fee from a Geoffrey de Waterbeck, (fn. 78) perhaps the same man as Geoffrey de Stokes. He died abt. 1345 (fn. 79) and in the following year his son John was returned as holding a ⅓-fee in Tetsworth. His assessment on only a ⅓-fee, John son of Simon Danvers and the Prebendary of Thame each holding another third, may represent some internal arrangement concerning the fee. (fn. 80) John de Wheatfield had died by 1361 and his heirs were Joan and Elizabeth. (fn. 81) They succeeded to the Tetsworth land, but in 1367 a Nicholas Tetsworth obtained half the property from Reginald de Grey and his wife Elizabeth and in 1374 he obtained the other half from Hugh Streatley and his wife Joan. (fn. 82) The descent of the property is not clear after this. In 1428 Walter Cotton, at that time lord of a Bletchingdon manor and of Exning (Suff.), held the Wheat field and Danvers property in Tetsworth, but no later reference to the Cotton tenure has been found. (fn. 83) It is probable that the land was entirely held by sub-tenants and became merged in other manors. The prebendary's ⅓-fee likewise has not been traced beyond 1428, but it appears to have followed the descent of Thame prebend. (fn. 84) Manors. From the time of its removal from Oddington to Thame (fn. 85) the Cistercian Abbey of Thame began to acquire land in Tetsworth through the gifts of the pious, and particularly from the families of the various holders of fees—Chevauchesul, Talemasch, and Danvers. Its property was later known as TETSWORTH manor. The abbey obtained a hide from Robert Chevauchesul bef. 1146; (fn. 86) in 1197 Ralph Danvers, with the consent of his lord and brother Robert Danvers, gave 2¼ virgates; (fn. 87) and in 1199 Alan, clerk of Tetsworth, and his wife Clarissa gave 2 virgates. (fn. 88) About the same time Robert Danvers, his brothers William and Roger, and their cousin Richard Talemasch each gave a virgate. (fn. 89) Their mother Emma Danvers had already given 2 acres. (fn. 90) The charters record in all the gift of 15½ virgates, (fn. 91) but from a survey made in about 1225 it appears that Thame Abbey held 8¼ virgates of the Danvers fee and 8¾ of the Talemasch fee, besides 3 virgates at farm and 12¼ acres in small parcels. (fn. 92) Its total holding was thus over 20 virgates. In 1279 the jurors declared that the abbot's holding was 9½ virgates held of Robert Danvers's fee by scutage and suit of his court, and 8½ virgates held of Peter Talemasch's fee by scutage. (fn. 93) Talemasch was by now dead, having given the abbey his Stoke Talmage manor as well as part of his Tetsworth fee. (fn. 94) In 1316 the abbot was therefore returned as joint lord of Tetsworth with Simon Danvers (fn. 95) and he held his share as 1 knight's fee. (fn. 96) The estate, usually known as the Grange, is first designated a manor in 1365, when the abbot was granted free warren there, (fn. 97) and was retained by the abbey until its dissolution in 1539. (fn. 98) In 1542 Thame Abbey's manor along with Stoke Talmage was granted by the Crown to Robert King, the last Abbot of Thame and the first Bishop of Oxford. (fn. 99) He proceeded to lease it in 1547 for 99 years at £20 2s. 10d. to Sir John (later Lord) Williams of Thame. (fn. 100) The manor was afterwards lost to the bishopric, and the lease to Lord Williams was terminated. In 1558 and 1560 Tetsworth manor was listed among the large sales of land to a number of London citizens, (fn. 101) but it was in the hands of the Crown again in 1589, when it was granted in fee simple for £44 5s. to Christopher Petty and his son Charnell, members of an old Tetsworth family. (fn. 102) Christopher Petty was already in possession of an estate in Tetsworth, which had been left to him by his father John Petty. This John Petty had been granted arms in 1570; had built up a large Oxfordshire estate; (fn. 103) and on his death in 1578 had divided his Tetsworth lands between two younger sons, George and Christopher. (fn. 104) In 1589 George Petty died, leaving his share to Christopher. (fn. 105) In 1602 the Pettys were given permission to sell Tetsworth manor to Walter Jones of Chastleton, (fn. 106) whose dau. Ellen md. Ralph Holt of Stoke Lyne. Since Thomas Holt, the son of Ralph and Ellen, later md. Charnell Petty's dau. Susan, (fn. 107) it is probable that the manor was returned to the Pettys in some kind of family settlement. Christopher Petty died in 1614, and his son Charnell succeeded. (fn. 108) On the latter's death in 1661 he left Tetsworth in trust for his young grand-son Christopher, the boy's father Christopher being already dead. (fn. 109) Christopher Petty obtained possession in 1674; (fn. 110) he married Hester, the dau. of Robert Parsons, a gentleman of Great Milton; but he was a man of 'unthriftiness, folly, and extravagance', (fn. 111) and had soon dissipated his estate. In 1680 and 1683 he sold a part of his land to Anthony Wood's brother Christopher, and in 1683 he sold the manor and other land, said to be worth £2,000, to Thomas Phillips, a lawyer of Ickford (Bucks.). (fn. 112) Petty's absorbing interest was bell-ringing, and Hearne says that he 'rang away … a good estate' and died 'very reduced' at Thame, probably in 1739. (fn. 113) Thomas Phillips died in 1705, having left most of his property to his son-in-law Lenthall Trotman of Bucknell, because his son Thomas had become a Roman Catholic; the property was to revert to the Phillips family in the event of the heir becoming a member of the Church of England. (fn. 114) Trotman died in 1710, (fn. 115) and in 1717 his two sons Samuel and Thomas were returned as owners of Tetsworth manor. (fn. 116) However, by 1733 Thomas Phillips appears to have recovered possession, for in that year he augmented with Tetsworth land the endowment of a charity in Ickford, founded by his father. (fn. 117) Thomas Phillips the younger died in 1742 leaving two sons, (fn. 118) both Roman Catholics, and the younger one Henry Phillips sold Tetsworth manor with land in Ickford to the Earl of Abingdon in 1756. It then consisted of only about 100 acres of land and a few quit-rents. (fn. 119) The manor formed part of the Abingdon estates until about 1810 and brought in an income of £120 odd. (fn. 120) It was apparently sold to the Revd. Samuel Ryder Weston, a canon of St. Paul's, (fn. 121) who was in possession of the manor-house and land in Tetsworth in 1810. (fn. 122) He died in 1821: his heirs were Charlotte Weston, who was lady of the manor in the 1850's, and Frances (neé Weston), the wife of A. H. Matthews (d. 1854), Vicar of Weston-on-the-Green, who owned Manor farm (116 acres). (fn. 123) In 1859 the property was in the hands of A. M. Matthews, the Revd. A. Matthews and the Revd. H. S. Ryder Matthews, nephews of Charlotte Weston. (fn. 124) In about 1866 the manor and Manor farm were bought by Joseph Cornish, a Tetsworth farmer, from the Matthews family. (fn. 125) During the reign of Edward III a John Windbush built up an estate in Tetsworth of some 9 messuages and about 150 acres with appurtenances. (fn. 126) In 1471, when this estate was acquired from a Richard Seymour and his wife Isabel by Richard Fowler, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, it was called WINDBUSH manor and consisted of 8 messuages and 260 acres of land. (fn. 127) Fowler owned much other Oxfordshire property, including the recently acquired Moreton manor in Thame, (fn. 128) and several manors in Buckinghamshire. He died in 1477, (fn. 129) and in 1504 Windbush was in the possession of his widow Joan, sister of Sir Thomas Danvers of Waterstock. (fn. 130) She died in 1505, (fn. 131) and Windbush was probably sold by her son and heir Richard Fowler (d. 1528), who was a spendthrift and certainly sold much of his other property. (fn. 132) By 1507 the manor seems to have been in the hands of Thomas Bradbury, a London mercer and alderman (d. 1510); (fn. 133) it is next recorded in 1540, when George Baldry of Hadley (Suff.), the son of Sir Thomas Baldry, another mercer and Mayor of London, died in possession of both Tetsworth and Moreton. (fn. 134) The custody of his infant heiress Elizabeth was granted to Sir Richard (later Lord) Rich, Chancellor of the Court of Augmentations, (fn. 135) and in about 1554 she md. his son Robert, 2nd Lord Rich, who died in 1581. (fn. 136) As her second husband she md. Robert Forth, and after her death in 1591 he held Tetsworth and Moreton for life. (fn. 137) They were inherited not by her eldest son Robert, who became Earl of Warwick, but by her second son, Sir Edwin Rich, who in 1601 sold them to Henry Savile, Warden of Merton College and Provost of Eton. (fn. 138) At the end of the 16th century the Pettys of Tetsworth had an interest in Windbush and may have been leasing it, (fn. 139) and in 1620 Savile seems to have mortgaged it to Maximilian Petty, a Thame lawyer. (fn. 140) After Savile's death in 1622 Windbush and Moreton were held for life by his widow Margaret, and were then inherited by their dau. Elizabeth, the wife of Sir John Sedley, Bt. (d. 1638), of Aylesford (Kent). (fn. 141) In 1656 the manors passed with the title to their youngest son Sir Charles Sedley, (fn. 142) who in 1669 sold Windbush to James Perrot of North Leigh, a member of an Old Oxfordshire family. (fn. 143) The property descended from the elder James Perrot (d. 1687) to his son James (d. 1725) and to his grandson Henry, who sold Windbush and Moreton in 1730 to Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough. (fn. 144) The property brought in an annual revenue of about £450. (fn. 145) In 1762 it was settled on Lord Charles Spencer of Wheatfield, a younger son of the 3rd Duke of Marlborough. (fn. 146) He died in 1820; his son John in 1831, the same year in which his grand-son Frederick Charles, Rector of Wheatfield, died, leaving an infant son. By this time the Spencer estates were so burdened with annuities that in 1835 an Act was passed to sell part of them in order to preserve the Wheatfield estate. (fn. 147) Manorial rights had probably long lapsed. A part of the 37 hides which the Bishop of Lincoln held in demesne in Thame in 1086 was in Tetsworth: (fn. 148) in 1279 eight tenants held 8¼ virgates from the bishop direct (in capite), (fn. 149) and in 1535 his estate in Tetsworth and Moreton was valued at £6 1s. 2d. (fn. 150) In 1547 the bishop was licensed to grant his TETSWORTH manor, along with other manors, to Edward Seymour, Duke of Somerset. (fn. 151) On his execution in 1552 Seymour's lands escheated to the Crown, and Tetsworth and Thame came into the possession of Lord Williams of Thame. (fn. 152) This Tetsworth manor was inherited by his daughter Isabella and her husband Sir Richard Wenman and followed the descent of Thame Park until the second part of the 17th century, although some of the land was sold to Charnell Petty in 1614. (fn. 153) The last time Tetsworth was mentioned among the Wenman lands was in 1678. (fn. 154) The land was evidently sold, for in 1842 the owner of Thame Park held no land in Tetsworth. (fn. 155)
From: Parishes: Tetsworth, A History of the County of Oxford: Volume 7: Dorchester and Thame hundreds (1962), pp. 147-160. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=63774
Accessed: 15 Apr 2012.

Haben Sie Ergänzungen, Korrekturen oder Fragen im Zusammenhang mit Ancher Chevauchesul lord of Tetsworth?
Der Autor dieser Publikation würde gerne von Ihnen hören!

Zeitbalken Ancher Chevauchesul lord of Tetsworth

Klicken Sie auf den Namen für weitere Informationen. Verwendete Symbole:  Großeltern    Eltern    Geschwister    Kinder